Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
If you were in the Star Wars universe which side would you pick?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 7593953" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>Yep.</p><p></p><p>With how they stink in military strategy, I'd form my own group and actually have competent military commanders. With just a few of those in charge we could probably defeat ALL the other factions with just a few fighters, much less starships.</p><p></p><p>No need to choose either or any of the factions, heck, the bounty hunter guild (if there is one) probably should be ruling the galaxy with how stupid the factions have acted so far, at least portrayed in the movies.</p><p></p><p>Keeping all your fleet around one planet? Dumb. We could take over the rest of the galaxy using criminals with that type of stupidity.</p><p></p><p>Not able to comprehend 3 dimensional space and do a pincer movement to capture or destroy three enemy ship? Dumb. With tactical minds like that we could use the same criminals to basically shoot from all directions and wipe that two dimensional thinking fleet caption out.</p><p></p><p>Not sending fighters who can out run and fly faster than the three enemy ships in front of you because you are afraid they might run out of fuel or can't be supported when none of them are really being shot out of space to begin with? Dumb. With that type of ridiculous logic, we could simply stay farther out of range than their fighters and send waves of our fighters in (once again, from all directions since their minds cannot comprehend this type of warfare) to basically wipe out their fleet.</p><p></p><p>These guys should have been destroyed by common criminal gangs looong before the movies took place with the type of military strategy and tactics they use and think of.</p><p></p><p>Have invisible ships that can take off and hyperspace to gambling planets without being stopped, but instead of putting a ton of people and ferrying them away you try a plan where the enemy can see slow moving ships visibly by just looking out a window? Once again, pincer movement with the same logic that you destroy any ships that jump away from the main fleet.</p><p></p><p>Have ships that can come and go via hyperspace as they wish...with fuel for an entire fleet for years being able to fit into it's hold...but instead of getting fuel you simply ignore that you could do that and have all your ships destroyed? Well, let's just blast any ships that come from them and let them run out of fuel. Maybe they'll run out of atmosphere eventually as well and they'll all kill themselves without us doing anything except making it so they can't escape.</p><p></p><p>I'd choose the original Rebellion who had much better leaders and never go into this alternate universe where everyone seems to have no idea of how tactics or strategy work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 7593953, member: 4348"] Yep. With how they stink in military strategy, I'd form my own group and actually have competent military commanders. With just a few of those in charge we could probably defeat ALL the other factions with just a few fighters, much less starships. No need to choose either or any of the factions, heck, the bounty hunter guild (if there is one) probably should be ruling the galaxy with how stupid the factions have acted so far, at least portrayed in the movies. Keeping all your fleet around one planet? Dumb. We could take over the rest of the galaxy using criminals with that type of stupidity. Not able to comprehend 3 dimensional space and do a pincer movement to capture or destroy three enemy ship? Dumb. With tactical minds like that we could use the same criminals to basically shoot from all directions and wipe that two dimensional thinking fleet caption out. Not sending fighters who can out run and fly faster than the three enemy ships in front of you because you are afraid they might run out of fuel or can't be supported when none of them are really being shot out of space to begin with? Dumb. With that type of ridiculous logic, we could simply stay farther out of range than their fighters and send waves of our fighters in (once again, from all directions since their minds cannot comprehend this type of warfare) to basically wipe out their fleet. These guys should have been destroyed by common criminal gangs looong before the movies took place with the type of military strategy and tactics they use and think of. Have invisible ships that can take off and hyperspace to gambling planets without being stopped, but instead of putting a ton of people and ferrying them away you try a plan where the enemy can see slow moving ships visibly by just looking out a window? Once again, pincer movement with the same logic that you destroy any ships that jump away from the main fleet. Have ships that can come and go via hyperspace as they wish...with fuel for an entire fleet for years being able to fit into it's hold...but instead of getting fuel you simply ignore that you could do that and have all your ships destroyed? Well, let's just blast any ships that come from them and let them run out of fuel. Maybe they'll run out of atmosphere eventually as well and they'll all kill themselves without us doing anything except making it so they can't escape. I'd choose the original Rebellion who had much better leaders and never go into this alternate universe where everyone seems to have no idea of how tactics or strategy work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
If you were in the Star Wars universe which side would you pick?
Top