Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If Your Builds Not Online By Level 6 Dont Bother?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 9652207" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>While additional rule support that supports higher level play would be welcome: It is not required. You can run successful adventures through 20th level that are exciting, interesting and entirely within RAW.</p><p></p><p>What <em>is</em> needed in many groups is training on how to build and run high level games that are not just attempts to "level up" low level games. Even published adventures run afoul of this challenge. </p><p></p><p>Too many DMs try to run a high level adventure in the same way that a low level adventure is typically built. They present the same types of challenges as low level play and there is frustration because there is magic available that negates the challenges. In turn, the DM negates the availability of the magic. That makes players feel like their choices in development are being invalidated - which is true. The DM, in these instances, ends up dictating the game. That kills a game fast.</p><p></p><p>A murder mystery works at level 1 or 2 ... but once you can speak with dead, most murder mysteries should be pretty darn easy to resolve. If they're not, it is because the DM is selecting to make the spell worthless in that instance - which feels like a DM taking away a player's toys. That is not to say that being true to the story will always mean a corpse will have valuable information ... just that it inherently feels like the DM is taking away the player tools almost all the time when the corpse does not give up information as the spell is designed to do. A little bit of a player ability being confounded is probably fine ... but if every time you want to use an ability it is negated by the DM because it is too useful - the game crashes.</p><p></p><p>This type of evolution of the game where challenges become trivial needs to happen. If the PCs have a magical solution that makes it easy to travel, to make money, to help people ... let it happen as a DM. Let them enjoy the free use of their powers. It makes them feel like powerful figures. If they're constantly forced to struggle to do everything they never get that chance to really feel powerful - which is a big part of higher level games.</p><p></p><p>Then, start to focus on the types of problems that these magics do not solve in one easy blow. An example is a political situation. You have a society of 250,000 people with 75,000 wanting to break up the society and form a smaller society of their own, another 75,000 that want to change the balance of power so that everyone has the same rights and another 50,000 that want the status quo not to change. There is no magic solution that just solves that problem. You can look to books, movies and TV series for inspiration for these types of storylines. </p><p></p><p>This type of evolution challenges your typical dungeon design. Fighting your way through a 40 room dungeon to get to the MacGuffin at the end does not make sense when the PCs can magically scout it out and then teleport to the end ... unless the DM takes away their toys. To that end, most dungeon delving needs to be rethought and different approaches need to be used, such as anticipate them teleporting to the focal point they need to engage and design the encounters so that enemies come to them in waves while the PCs do what they need to do or wait for something to happen. </p><p></p><p>Use "Yes and" improve mentalities to make the story work where you build upon what the PCs do rather than negate it. </p><p></p><p>TLDR: Games work at higher levels when DMs run higher level games that make sense. They fail when DMs try to run low level games at higher levels - and players get bored while the DM is constantly frustrated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 9652207, member: 2629"] While additional rule support that supports higher level play would be welcome: It is not required. You can run successful adventures through 20th level that are exciting, interesting and entirely within RAW. What [I]is[/I] needed in many groups is training on how to build and run high level games that are not just attempts to "level up" low level games. Even published adventures run afoul of this challenge. Too many DMs try to run a high level adventure in the same way that a low level adventure is typically built. They present the same types of challenges as low level play and there is frustration because there is magic available that negates the challenges. In turn, the DM negates the availability of the magic. That makes players feel like their choices in development are being invalidated - which is true. The DM, in these instances, ends up dictating the game. That kills a game fast. A murder mystery works at level 1 or 2 ... but once you can speak with dead, most murder mysteries should be pretty darn easy to resolve. If they're not, it is because the DM is selecting to make the spell worthless in that instance - which feels like a DM taking away a player's toys. That is not to say that being true to the story will always mean a corpse will have valuable information ... just that it inherently feels like the DM is taking away the player tools almost all the time when the corpse does not give up information as the spell is designed to do. A little bit of a player ability being confounded is probably fine ... but if every time you want to use an ability it is negated by the DM because it is too useful - the game crashes. This type of evolution of the game where challenges become trivial needs to happen. If the PCs have a magical solution that makes it easy to travel, to make money, to help people ... let it happen as a DM. Let them enjoy the free use of their powers. It makes them feel like powerful figures. If they're constantly forced to struggle to do everything they never get that chance to really feel powerful - which is a big part of higher level games. Then, start to focus on the types of problems that these magics do not solve in one easy blow. An example is a political situation. You have a society of 250,000 people with 75,000 wanting to break up the society and form a smaller society of their own, another 75,000 that want to change the balance of power so that everyone has the same rights and another 50,000 that want the status quo not to change. There is no magic solution that just solves that problem. You can look to books, movies and TV series for inspiration for these types of storylines. This type of evolution challenges your typical dungeon design. Fighting your way through a 40 room dungeon to get to the MacGuffin at the end does not make sense when the PCs can magically scout it out and then teleport to the end ... unless the DM takes away their toys. To that end, most dungeon delving needs to be rethought and different approaches need to be used, such as anticipate them teleporting to the focal point they need to engage and design the encounters so that enemies come to them in waves while the PCs do what they need to do or wait for something to happen. Use "Yes and" improve mentalities to make the story work where you build upon what the PCs do rather than negate it. TLDR: Games work at higher levels when DMs run higher level games that make sense. They fail when DMs try to run low level games at higher levels - and players get bored while the DM is constantly frustrated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If Your Builds Not Online By Level 6 Dont Bother?
Top