Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 3646334" data-attributes="member: 4134">Agreed. It's almost as bad as discussions about what edition of D&D is best (no one here has the heart to tell diaglo that his favourite edition stinks, but everyone else knows it.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> (just kidding, of course))By the way, when will discussions about editions be banned from here? I have a list of other hot topics as well! (again, joking, of course.)Being serious for a moment (have to type fast, can't keep up the charade for long): Beyond the fact that many people are very passionate about R&P, it doesn't really have a place here, so I think it's good that they're off-limits here.As I said, there are things within the field of RPGs that will often devolve into flamewars, but since this is a site about RPGs, they should still be allowed (and when moderators step in then, they know they're earning their money with core business).Other off-topic stuff doesn't get people nearly as passionate, so it's not too bad allowing discussion, especially if it ties into D&D (like "what would Mal Reynold's D&D stats be?)</blockquote>

Verification