Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Illusions and Passive Investigation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6807480" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Well, not really. </p><p></p><p>To get any mileage out of a passive check, <strong>the assumption is that you have a high score</strong>.</p><p></p><p>A dim-witted barbarian (Int 8, no proficiency) will <strong>never find anything</strong> during his investigations if you use the passive score, even if the illusion is as easy to find as DC 10. If you allow him to roll, on the other hand, he will now find 45% of all these illusions (rolling 11 on his d20). </p><p></p><p>The controversy regarding passive checks is "but then he auto-spots every hiding monster" but remember this goes both ways.</p><p></p><p>Again, as the DM you need to use the passive check mechanism judiciously. You can't just use it always (the "the rules says so" camp) and you really aren't giving it a chance if you use it never (the "it's broken" camp).</p><p></p><p>The passive check mechanism only works if you use it <strong>when you the DM decide to</strong>.</p><p></p><p>It's an aid to speed up gameplay, not an excuse to stop making DM judgement calls.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6807480, member: 12731"] Well, not really. To get any mileage out of a passive check, [B]the assumption is that you have a high score[/B]. A dim-witted barbarian (Int 8, no proficiency) will [B]never find anything[/B] during his investigations if you use the passive score, even if the illusion is as easy to find as DC 10. If you allow him to roll, on the other hand, he will now find 45% of all these illusions (rolling 11 on his d20). The controversy regarding passive checks is "but then he auto-spots every hiding monster" but remember this goes both ways. Again, as the DM you need to use the passive check mechanism judiciously. You can't just use it always (the "the rules says so" camp) and you really aren't giving it a chance if you use it never (the "it's broken" camp). The passive check mechanism only works if you use it [B]when you the DM decide to[/B]. It's an aid to speed up gameplay, not an excuse to stop making DM judgement calls. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Illusions and Passive Investigation
Top