Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I'm annoyed at archers.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 490954" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>Not exactly- but I think it's good to have options. For instance, if you fight something that is horrendously mobile you may never get into melee. There's nothing wrong with having options; soften the enemy up first and then mince them when you're close enough. I doubt whether you'd ever find an archer who doesn't have a melee weapon in reserve; think of it as the converse- you have a missile weapon in reserve.</p><p></p><p>I agree that archers are outragous in 3e; the first group I ran in 3e had an archer-type human fighter who cleaned up a lot of the fights early on. I definitely sympathize. But if they don't actually have the magic arrows, it only takes one dispel magic to nerf those 50 GMW arrows and one high-DR creature to make them sweat. (Demons, devils, other spell-like ability toting things...)</p><p></p><p>The thing is, it isn't just archers who are outrageous: it's everyone. Who gets to shine really varies from group to group, and as a dm one thing I try hard to do is to make sure that everyone gets their chance- even the classes and races not in the party. "Boy, I wish we had a druid right about now!" I try to do the same thing with skills and feats too- "Crap, here's where I really wish I'd taken Blindfighting" and "Who has a decent diplomacy score??"</p><p></p><p>If you ever need to take someone alive, the melee types are much better at it (heck, that's where monks shine). If you need to take out a wand or a magic weapon that is tearing the group up you generally need a melee type. It's all situational.</p><p></p><p>And, of course, situations depend on the dm.</p><p></p><p>I had to do a lot of adjusting when 3e came out. Things are different and require a different type of dm juggling act to make everyone shine. So while I sympathize with your position, I still think you can make an equal argument that the melee types are overpowered, or spellcasters, or clerics, or whoever- it just depends on the game and the types of encounters you have come up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 490954, member: 1210"] Not exactly- but I think it's good to have options. For instance, if you fight something that is horrendously mobile you may never get into melee. There's nothing wrong with having options; soften the enemy up first and then mince them when you're close enough. I doubt whether you'd ever find an archer who doesn't have a melee weapon in reserve; think of it as the converse- you have a missile weapon in reserve. I agree that archers are outragous in 3e; the first group I ran in 3e had an archer-type human fighter who cleaned up a lot of the fights early on. I definitely sympathize. But if they don't actually have the magic arrows, it only takes one dispel magic to nerf those 50 GMW arrows and one high-DR creature to make them sweat. (Demons, devils, other spell-like ability toting things...) The thing is, it isn't just archers who are outrageous: it's everyone. Who gets to shine really varies from group to group, and as a dm one thing I try hard to do is to make sure that everyone gets their chance- even the classes and races not in the party. "Boy, I wish we had a druid right about now!" I try to do the same thing with skills and feats too- "Crap, here's where I really wish I'd taken Blindfighting" and "Who has a decent diplomacy score??" If you ever need to take someone alive, the melee types are much better at it (heck, that's where monks shine). If you need to take out a wand or a magic weapon that is tearing the group up you generally need a melee type. It's all situational. And, of course, situations depend on the dm. I had to do a lot of adjusting when 3e came out. Things are different and require a different type of dm juggling act to make everyone shine. So while I sympathize with your position, I still think you can make an equal argument that the melee types are overpowered, or spellcasters, or clerics, or whoever- it just depends on the game and the types of encounters you have come up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I'm annoyed at archers.
Top