Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I'm annoyed at archers.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 496991" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>If my PC starts getting hammered by rogues, his first action is to reach into his backpack for that Obscuring Mist scroll. By the time PCs have +5d6 sneak attacks (9th level) and improved invisibility (7th level), the enemies ought to have some way of dealing it. Barbarian or rogue levels, darkness, mist, displacement, Fortification Armor, Blink, Invisibility Purge, See Invisibility, True Seeing, or simply being construct, elemental, or undead.</p><p></p><p>Sneak attacking rogue archers can be effective, but shouldn't destroy all encounters. There is a wide variety of ways for intelligent foes to deal with sneak attacks and invisibility by that point and many unintelligent foes are immune to them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well part of the issue here is that your character was an <em>elven</em> fighter. High dex, low con. Of course you're going to be a better archer than melee fighter. Make the character a half-orc, dwarf, or human, and things change a little.</p><p></p><p>Really though, I don't think you're right about the comparison. If GMW (a 3rd or 4th level spell) is automatically included in the archer comparisons, the melee fighter should be able to assume buffs as well.</p><p></p><p>Taking a really simple example:</p><p>Elf Ftr 8: Str 14, Dex 18, Con 12 PBS, PS, RS, WF: comp longbow, WS: comp longbow, Imp Crit: comp longbow, Bracers of Archery, +1 Flaming bow, clvl 8 GMW on arrows </p><p>Atk +16/+16/+11 (1d8+10+1d6) Avg 19/hit</p><p>Elf Ftr 12: As above, clvl 12 GMW, +2 Flaming bow </p><p>Atk +23/+23/+18/+13 (1d8+13+1d6) Avg 22/hit</p><p></p><p>Half-orc Ftr 8: Str 18 (20), Dex 12, Con 14, WF Greataxe, WS Greataxe, Power Attack, Cleave, Great Cleave, Imp Crit: Greataxe, Gauntlets of Ogre Power, +1 Corrosive Greataxe, Haste Spell</p><p>Atk +17 (haste partial charge)/+15/+10 & cleaves (1d12+9+1d6) avg. 19/hit</p><p>Half-orc Ftr 12: As above but Str (21) +2 Frost greataxe, Blindfight, Combat Reflexes, Expert Tactician, Power Critical</p><p>Atk +22 (haste partial charge)/+20/+15/+10 (and cleaves) (1d12+10+1d6 avg 20/hit)</p><p></p><p>On the face of it, it looks like the melee fighter is a bit behind in damage dealing. But there are three other factors: the melee character has several other options for more attacks. He has great cleave which enables him to get an indeterminate number of extra attacks if he faces multiple weak foes. He also has expert tactician which enables hit to attack again (at his highest attack bonus) against any foe without their dex bonus. If he rolls well for intiative, is improved invisible, or has a comrade cast darkness on him (sure, he can't see but his opponents can't either and therefore lose their dex bonus--expert tactician kicks in and he can use Blindfight for added advantage), this is better than rapid shot. The melee character can also trade in unneeded attack bonus for damage with power attack. The melee character can also use power critical for an automatic critical threat. Used on the partial charge with power attack 2, that will yield an average of 59 points of damage (3d12+36+1d6).</p><p></p><p>But the comparison still plays to the archer's strengths. The melee character would get a lot of milage out of multiclassing to barbarian--even if only for one level (and then taking the extra rage feat). That would punch his attack bonusses and damages significantly higher--defeating the archer in either contest.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Stopping the long range archer isn't an issue. Since bracers of archery, weapon specialization, and sneak attack all only work within 30 feet, the archer's damage goes down dramatically at long range. The 30' range archer is still quite defeatable (anything that cuts off line of sight works--fog, darkness, etc--and the archer is within charge and sunder (or power critical) range). The Shoot on the Run 45' range (move to 30', fire, move back) archer is a bit harder to deal with but not much.</p><p></p><p>Archers contribute to a party, but even with the stacking enhancement bonusses, they shouldn't dominate a well-constructed melee character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 496991, member: 3146"] If my PC starts getting hammered by rogues, his first action is to reach into his backpack for that Obscuring Mist scroll. By the time PCs have +5d6 sneak attacks (9th level) and improved invisibility (7th level), the enemies ought to have some way of dealing it. Barbarian or rogue levels, darkness, mist, displacement, Fortification Armor, Blink, Invisibility Purge, See Invisibility, True Seeing, or simply being construct, elemental, or undead. Sneak attacking rogue archers can be effective, but shouldn't destroy all encounters. There is a wide variety of ways for intelligent foes to deal with sneak attacks and invisibility by that point and many unintelligent foes are immune to them. [b][/b] Well part of the issue here is that your character was an [i]elven[/i] fighter. High dex, low con. Of course you're going to be a better archer than melee fighter. Make the character a half-orc, dwarf, or human, and things change a little. Really though, I don't think you're right about the comparison. If GMW (a 3rd or 4th level spell) is automatically included in the archer comparisons, the melee fighter should be able to assume buffs as well. Taking a really simple example: Elf Ftr 8: Str 14, Dex 18, Con 12 PBS, PS, RS, WF: comp longbow, WS: comp longbow, Imp Crit: comp longbow, Bracers of Archery, +1 Flaming bow, clvl 8 GMW on arrows Atk +16/+16/+11 (1d8+10+1d6) Avg 19/hit Elf Ftr 12: As above, clvl 12 GMW, +2 Flaming bow Atk +23/+23/+18/+13 (1d8+13+1d6) Avg 22/hit Half-orc Ftr 8: Str 18 (20), Dex 12, Con 14, WF Greataxe, WS Greataxe, Power Attack, Cleave, Great Cleave, Imp Crit: Greataxe, Gauntlets of Ogre Power, +1 Corrosive Greataxe, Haste Spell Atk +17 (haste partial charge)/+15/+10 & cleaves (1d12+9+1d6) avg. 19/hit Half-orc Ftr 12: As above but Str (21) +2 Frost greataxe, Blindfight, Combat Reflexes, Expert Tactician, Power Critical Atk +22 (haste partial charge)/+20/+15/+10 (and cleaves) (1d12+10+1d6 avg 20/hit) On the face of it, it looks like the melee fighter is a bit behind in damage dealing. But there are three other factors: the melee character has several other options for more attacks. He has great cleave which enables him to get an indeterminate number of extra attacks if he faces multiple weak foes. He also has expert tactician which enables hit to attack again (at his highest attack bonus) against any foe without their dex bonus. If he rolls well for intiative, is improved invisible, or has a comrade cast darkness on him (sure, he can't see but his opponents can't either and therefore lose their dex bonus--expert tactician kicks in and he can use Blindfight for added advantage), this is better than rapid shot. The melee character can also trade in unneeded attack bonus for damage with power attack. The melee character can also use power critical for an automatic critical threat. Used on the partial charge with power attack 2, that will yield an average of 59 points of damage (3d12+36+1d6). But the comparison still plays to the archer's strengths. The melee character would get a lot of milage out of multiclassing to barbarian--even if only for one level (and then taking the extra rage feat). That would punch his attack bonusses and damages significantly higher--defeating the archer in either contest. [b][/B] Stopping the long range archer isn't an issue. Since bracers of archery, weapon specialization, and sneak attack all only work within 30 feet, the archer's damage goes down dramatically at long range. The 30' range archer is still quite defeatable (anything that cuts off line of sight works--fog, darkness, etc--and the archer is within charge and sunder (or power critical) range). The Shoot on the Run 45' range (move to 30', fire, move back) archer is a bit harder to deal with but not much. Archers contribute to a party, but even with the stacking enhancement bonusses, they shouldn't dominate a well-constructed melee character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I'm annoyed at archers.
Top