Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Darklone" data-source="post: 503089" data-attributes="member: 1372">Fascinating. You really took that "ride a dragon" advice serious, didn't you? Well, that says it all.For you: If you read it closely, this was an exaggeration of your mentality in previous posts to graciously explain me how high level games work. *dripping sarcasm for those who need this written*About the archers balance. Olgar gave some nice examples. Add in +4 cover in combat (that is not nullified by precise shot) if your enemy keeps the melee fighters between you and the archers as anyone should do... and you end up with less damage statistically.Just give me one example how an archer of any level does more damage than the melee fighter and you could as well build a melee fighter who does the same. Add Prestige classes into the fray and things get out of hand. But I haven't seen an archer smackdown so far that was sooo much better than the melee smackdowns. You wrote that it depends on the DM if I balance things against the archers. Ever asked yourself if the DM in your examples perhaps plays the game in a way that prefers archers?Hey guys, what about a nice little poll if archers are unbalanced <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />?</blockquote>