Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I'm annoyed at archers.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 508523" data-attributes="member: 1149"><p>Actually he did figure in the GMW on the greatsword. The reason the fighter did not get a second is it does him no good. Thats one of the points being highlighted... that GMW stacks for archers and does not for melee.</p><p></p><p>If you want to run comparisons assuming each character gets an identical set of buffs, that is an interesting idea but in as much as it is not what happens in play, it is fairly useless.</p><p></p><p>i have NEVER seen a mage decide on buffing by dint of "how many levels have i thrown on so and so versus this other guy. They throw the best spells they can and as many as they can afford. its not a case of "do you get GMW or bull strength" its a case of how many can i spare and bull strength is not competing with GMW.</p><p></p><p>IN PLAY, in my game here is what happens.</p><p></p><p>The night before, when they are ready for bed, the 12th level sor with extend hands out a number of GMWx (24 hours) and uses his last couple GMW-X on arrows. they then divide the arrows up, most going to the archer. Every fighter type gets one weapon GMWed and they divy up about 100 arrows. i think this burns 6 4th level spells and since he has something like 8 fourth, 6 fifth and 3 sixth this is not really a hardship. The spell slots will be recovered by morning so the loss of spells only really is felt for about a 9 hour period.</p><p></p><p>He also burns a number of second level buffs... endurance is his spell of choice, iirc, as extended versions as well. The fighter is already in gauntlets +4 for strength so a buff of bs would not help (much, if at all.)</p><p></p><p>So while for a theoreticcal comparison, mathcing up spell levels of buffing would be interesting, it does not match the way things go in the game. there is no mechanism active in the game to force this parity and the system encourages doubling up on the archer because of the stacking issue.</p><p></p><p>IF the rules were changed to allow a melee weapon to get two stacking GMWs, then the comparison should include one or two GMW for each, because thats what they would be going for.</p><p> </p><p>i think, overall, this is one of the reasons so many have seemed amenable to changing bow and arrow stacking</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Petrosian, post: 508523, member: 1149"] Actually he did figure in the GMW on the greatsword. The reason the fighter did not get a second is it does him no good. Thats one of the points being highlighted... that GMW stacks for archers and does not for melee. If you want to run comparisons assuming each character gets an identical set of buffs, that is an interesting idea but in as much as it is not what happens in play, it is fairly useless. i have NEVER seen a mage decide on buffing by dint of "how many levels have i thrown on so and so versus this other guy. They throw the best spells they can and as many as they can afford. its not a case of "do you get GMW or bull strength" its a case of how many can i spare and bull strength is not competing with GMW. IN PLAY, in my game here is what happens. The night before, when they are ready for bed, the 12th level sor with extend hands out a number of GMWx (24 hours) and uses his last couple GMW-X on arrows. they then divide the arrows up, most going to the archer. Every fighter type gets one weapon GMWed and they divy up about 100 arrows. i think this burns 6 4th level spells and since he has something like 8 fourth, 6 fifth and 3 sixth this is not really a hardship. The spell slots will be recovered by morning so the loss of spells only really is felt for about a 9 hour period. He also burns a number of second level buffs... endurance is his spell of choice, iirc, as extended versions as well. The fighter is already in gauntlets +4 for strength so a buff of bs would not help (much, if at all.) So while for a theoreticcal comparison, mathcing up spell levels of buffing would be interesting, it does not match the way things go in the game. there is no mechanism active in the game to force this parity and the system encourages doubling up on the archer because of the stacking issue. IF the rules were changed to allow a melee weapon to get two stacking GMWs, then the comparison should include one or two GMW for each, because thats what they would be going for. i think, overall, this is one of the reasons so many have seemed amenable to changing bow and arrow stacking [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I'm annoyed at archers.
Top