Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 513420" data-attributes="member: 1149">[/B]</blockquote>I am sorry, it appearsperhaps that I am confused. I have not been comparing archer and melee guy comparisons based on "as if they were fighting each other." I was sticking with, what i had percieved, the thread to be about which is their capability against a mix of adversaries as PCs (and to a lesser extent as NPCs) in a tems environment, not some duel between individuals.I would surmise that the result of a "archer vs meleer" one-on-one would probably biol down to ranged or not ranged more than most anything else.If i misunderstood your post about spells distributions, then thats my bad. As a Gm, i am more conerned with balance between PC characters and their abilities as part of a team than the ubiquitous "who wins this duel" kind of stuff, tho i do understand why others are more interested in such. Well i can certainly understand the "do it for fun" angle but then that also would not necessarily tend towards the sort of "spread evenly" levels thing you mentioned. it seems that while we both have our guys using different criteria, neither of us is using "spread spell levels evenly" as a basis for that decision, which is what my point was.thanks.[/QUOTE]