NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shard O'Glase" data-source="post: 517817" data-attributes="member: 1134">Yes I suck for the Hi-Jack.  But spell-casters espcially arcane style ones ahve always been a favorite of mine in RPGs and novels.  I play them in games where they suck and I play them in games where they rock.  In many campaigns in D&D though where there are sufficient encoutners per day, I almost don't want to play one because the amount of lime light I can steal if I paly my wiz/sor even half intelligently is obscene.  Damage dealing doesn't bother me much with the D4 hp crap bab, one good save, and limited resources.  But ugh I can handle virtually any situation with spells, the I can solve any problem and I only need others as meat shields thing gets on my nerves.  Which is why I like the evercrack RPG the spellcasters can dish it out in their specialty but they aren't so much the do anything yabos they are in d&d.(though the divine casters in evercrack annoy me in that they have offensive spells on par with all the arcane dorks except the wizard and they have just as much utility and they still get good hp, saves, bab etc.)But in my 3e camapign to help v the spellcasters all non spellcasters got a boost of 2 skill points a level and a widended there class skill list.  Bards got 2 more skill points since I thought they were a bit weak, and paladins/ranges got +1 skill pont a level and a slightly broadended skill list since they are only partial casters.) This doesn't help in the archer v grunt debate, which is why its a hi-jack and why that yes I do suck.</blockquote>

Verification