Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Winterthorn" data-source="post: 3564813" data-attributes="member: 1702">If 4E like SW Saga Ed, then No Thank You.I must preface my remarks to say I, like many folks here, will probably get a copy of the 4E PH and base further decisions predicated upon the quality of the new edition rules set. Having invested in 3.0/3.5 in many hundreds of dollars - I don't see myself buying everything all over again. Most likely I'll port the best of 4E into my 3.5E games (or vice versa <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ); I figure 4E cannot be big departure from 3.0/3.5 without radical changes, and the Third Edition of D&D, although not perfect, is really not begging for a massive overhaul.I've seen a copy of the new Star Wars Saga Edition. It looks good for what SW is supposed to be: simplistic science-fantasy space opera - the new rules possess a flavour very supportive of the Star Wars mythos! But if D&D 4E goes the SW Saga route, I will be very disappointed. Sure Third Ed needs another tweak & clean, but the SW Saga Edition is too unimaginative and too streamlined for Dungeons & Dragons which I percieve to be more creatively demanding given its vast array of material and diversity of FRPG hobbyists. For some reason SW Saga Ed does not appear to suffice as a model for what 4E should be... I won't say more at this point as I need to study this further.'Tis best for now to wait and see, I think. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification