Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Destil" data-source="post: 5569015" data-attributes="member: 1980">I have two fullblade wielders in my current game and I'm playing one in a second campaign. All three are different.The first is a stormsoul genasi swordmage who wields a no-dachi. How does he carry it? Electromagnitisim. It hovers behind his back when he's not using it. For him, it's just a really big-ass sword.The second is a avenger of Olladra who uses a unique sword no one else in the party has ever seen the likes of before. He has a dervish dance-fighting style and wields a large curved blade with a grip on both ends, allowing spinning and slashing strikes with a variety of grips he switches between. His amazing luck also plays into how well the weapon works for him.Finally, I'm playing a cleric of Sarenrae. For him it's simply a great-scimitar, but the force of his faith empowers his blows to cut far deeper than anyone else wielding the same weapon.I would say 'yes' in a world where halfling adventurers can kill hundred foot long dragons or 20 foot tall giants. That said if it bothers you as a player there's no reason you can't argue that your own full blade proficiency as a way to represent how you wield a masterfully forged katana, go for it.For what it's worth I have a bit of a verisimilitude problem myself with longbows and greatbows used on horseback and shooting 20 shots from a crossbow in the time it would actually take to load it once. But I just sort of ignore those.</blockquote>

Verification