Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jacktannery" data-source="post: 6811955" data-attributes="member: 6667121">Fair enough, I accept that I likely misjudged you. I actually agree with the main point of your post directly above (that a martial support class must come from a 5E place, not from 4E port).However, it strikes me that the ideas Hussar has put forward here in this thread are very reasonable, are 'capable of fitting in 5e's core system framework and design parameters' and are 'balanced and 5E apt'. I think this is a direction you should encourage and get behind. Whilst he has not constructed an entire new class (as of yet), I don't think that was the point of his thread. I think he is articulating what such a class could achieve within a 5E paradigm. This is exactly the sort of approach that could include you.Nor do I see other proponents of a 5E martial support class, such as Mellored, etc., 'fervently' or 'extremely' criticising Hussar's ideas. The only person who could be interpreted as doing that is you, but I realise you are critiquing because you genuinely care about the issue, and that critique is not meant to be negative. I don't think there is a strong 'pro-warlord' contingent out there trying to do damage to this sort of genuine attempt to encourage a 5E-centred martial support class.</blockquote>