Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 7158935" data-attributes="member: 6801845">If you allow people to place the numbers where you want, given normal distribution people will still probably have ... wait for it ... cons between 12 and 16.Unless of course you make them roll and use the dice in sequence.&nbsp; But why even bother with that?&nbsp; The DM should just decide what the stats will be and let the people know what they're going to play.&nbsp; Because after all, there is only one true way to play D&amp;D and allowing people to play the character they want is unforgivable.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/rant.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rant:" title="Rant&nbsp; &nbsp; :rant:" data-shortname=":rant:" />I was just looking back at characters I've played for living campaigns and I think Xeviat would hate my characters.&nbsp; I mean, I've had relatively intelligent fighters and charismatic wizards and all that, but in every case they had at least a 12 con.&nbsp; The horror!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 7158935, member: 6801845"] If you allow people to place the numbers where you want, given normal distribution people will still probably have ... wait for it ... cons between 12 and 16. Unless of course you make them roll and use the dice in sequence. But why even bother with that? The DM should just decide what the stats will be and let the people know what they're going to play. Because after all, there is only one true way to play D&D and allowing people to play the character they want is unforgivable. :rant: I was just looking back at characters I've played for living campaigns and I think Xeviat would hate my characters. I mean, I've had relatively intelligent fighters and charismatic wizards and all that, but in every case they had at least a 12 con. The horror! [/QUOTE]

Verification