Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kelleris" data-source="post: 2226210" data-attributes="member: 19130">Chorn - Of course I didn't think anyone would actually annihilate space-time due to this spell, but I like the image.&nbsp; (Although I'd probably win the award for most damage to a campaign from a single spell if that happened, and that would be fun!&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> )&nbsp; And it's a valid rules-concern too.&nbsp; I kinda had magic missile's &quot;no objects&quot; thing in mind here, so it's creatures only as I'd originally intended.&nbsp; I'm not sure if the complexity trade-off for the entertainment value of affecting objects is worth it.&nbsp; I need to think that over.&nbsp; Your crazy tactical-temporal shenanigans would also work.&nbsp; That's a good idea.&nbsp; I would've thought the high chance of stunning would be enough of a kick to the face to cover it, but this makes sense too.In the &quot;Kelleris&quot; version, absolutely nothing.&nbsp; Sometimes weird things happen when you make the universe self-correct.&nbsp; They can't go above max HP, of course, but that's true with all healing.&nbsp; They could also take a small amount of damage from a spell that was never actually cast, of course.&nbsp; The &quot;Chorn&quot; version, of course, avoids this odd effect, which I like for flavor.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kelleris, post: 2226210, member: 19130"] Chorn - Of course I didn't think anyone would actually annihilate space-time due to this spell, but I like the image. (Although I'd probably win the award for most damage to a campaign from a single spell if that happened, and that would be fun! :D ) And it's a valid rules-concern too. I kinda had [I]magic missile[/I]'s "no objects" thing in mind here, so it's creatures only as I'd originally intended. I'm not sure if the complexity trade-off for the entertainment value of affecting objects is worth it. I need to think that over. Your crazy tactical-temporal shenanigans would also work. That's a good idea. I would've thought the high chance of stunning would be enough of a kick to the face to cover it, but this makes sense too. In the "Kelleris" version, absolutely nothing. Sometimes weird things happen when you make the universe self-correct. They can't go above max HP, of course, but that's true with all healing. They could also take a small amount of damage from a spell that was never actually cast, of course. The "Chorn" version, of course, avoids this odd effect, which I like for flavor. [/QUOTE]

Verification