Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Immediate-action Spell - Revised and Now Named "Kelleris's Antecedent Assailment"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedShirtNo5" data-source="post: 2229584" data-attributes="member: 173"><p>Actually, given the nature of the spell, I'm not so sure. Suppose the PC doesn't have the spell prepared, but has a pearl of power and still has a standard action left. Can the PC use the immediate action to create the blast, arguing that "Hey, I'll be able to cast the spell next round by activating the pearl this round"? (I'm assuming pearl is standard action, although you should get the idea even if it isn't). Similarly, can the PC create the blast by arguing "I'll be able to take the scroll from my fellow wizard this round and cast it next round"? So does the spell actually have to be prepared/etc., or can the effect be created based on player imagination of a condition that will permit the spell to be cast next round? I can see arguments for doing it either way. In a formal version of the spell I would have it explicitly stated which way it should work. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Maybe I wasn't clear. It seems fairly evident (to me) that the paradox correction should be a non-magical effect. That should be stated explicitly, since the default assumption is generally that all spell effects are magical. So the target should be healed and the caster stunned, regardless of whether they are in an anti-magic zone when the paradox correction effect takes place.</p><p> </p><p>This is such a fun spell to work on.</p><p> </p><p>-RedShirt</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedShirtNo5, post: 2229584, member: 173"] Actually, given the nature of the spell, I'm not so sure. Suppose the PC doesn't have the spell prepared, but has a pearl of power and still has a standard action left. Can the PC use the immediate action to create the blast, arguing that "Hey, I'll be able to cast the spell next round by activating the pearl this round"? (I'm assuming pearl is standard action, although you should get the idea even if it isn't). Similarly, can the PC create the blast by arguing "I'll be able to take the scroll from my fellow wizard this round and cast it next round"? So does the spell actually have to be prepared/etc., or can the effect be created based on player imagination of a condition that will permit the spell to be cast next round? I can see arguments for doing it either way. In a formal version of the spell I would have it explicitly stated which way it should work. Maybe I wasn't clear. It seems fairly evident (to me) that the paradox correction should be a non-magical effect. That should be stated explicitly, since the default assumption is generally that all spell effects are magical. So the target should be healed and the caster stunned, regardless of whether they are in an anti-magic zone when the paradox correction effect takes place. This is such a fun spell to work on. -RedShirt [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Immediate-action Spell - Revised and Now Named "Kelleris's Antecedent Assailment"
Top