Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
immediate and Swift actions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kexmal" data-source="post: 6321942" data-attributes="member: 6777190"><p>Thank you mark but i am definitely not confused... please read previous posts. i know what a round is and a turn i think you guys are confused in that the descritpion of immediate actions is screwy BUT read page 7 top left of rules compendium it makes it clear you can take either a swift OR an immediate. Just like you can take a move and standard OR a full-round. Excluive "or". Tell me that that use of "or" on page 7 of rules compendium is inclusive and im on baord but you cant cause its ambiguous text (meaning its upto DM). But contextually (considering the use of "or" in the PREVIOUS sentence is unambiguously exclusive) I have no reason to assume the use of "or" in the NEXT sentence is not as well exclusive. Please dont tell me I dont know what a round is maybe your just wrong eh???</p><p>HAHA Im not the one that says you can use more than one during a round but ponder this: a PC uses a swift action on his turn during round X, and on NOT his turn during round X he uses an immediate. That I am saying is not allowed BUt it is what people are saying is allowed. So you are wrong to say that is it IMPOSSIBLE to use a swift and immediate in the same round if what dandu and others are sayiing is TRUE then of course you can use a swift and an immediate in the same round I am denying this. What you have said is just confused. Meaning saying: "<span style="color: #000000">So long as you keep this concept of rounds in mind, you'll find that there's no instance in which a character will use more than one Immediate OR Swift action per round." Is just confused and not relevant. If others are right then your wrong if mI am right you are right but NOt for the reasons you give. Actually I think YOUr confusing rounds and turns there are NO personal rounds 9for spell duration and duration yes BUT not for rounds per se, yes a spell duration starts on the turhn of the person casting BUT that is spell duration and duration NOT rounds perse).</span><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kexmal, post: 6321942, member: 6777190"] Thank you mark but i am definitely not confused... please read previous posts. i know what a round is and a turn i think you guys are confused in that the descritpion of immediate actions is screwy BUT read page 7 top left of rules compendium it makes it clear you can take either a swift OR an immediate. Just like you can take a move and standard OR a full-round. Excluive "or". Tell me that that use of "or" on page 7 of rules compendium is inclusive and im on baord but you cant cause its ambiguous text (meaning its upto DM). But contextually (considering the use of "or" in the PREVIOUS sentence is unambiguously exclusive) I have no reason to assume the use of "or" in the NEXT sentence is not as well exclusive. Please dont tell me I dont know what a round is maybe your just wrong eh??? HAHA Im not the one that says you can use more than one during a round but ponder this: a PC uses a swift action on his turn during round X, and on NOT his turn during round X he uses an immediate. That I am saying is not allowed BUt it is what people are saying is allowed. So you are wrong to say that is it IMPOSSIBLE to use a swift and immediate in the same round if what dandu and others are sayiing is TRUE then of course you can use a swift and an immediate in the same round I am denying this. What you have said is just confused. Meaning saying: "[COLOR=#000000]So long as you keep this concept of rounds in mind, you'll find that there's no instance in which a character will use more than one Immediate OR Swift action per round." Is just confused and not relevant. If others are right then your wrong if mI am right you are right but NOt for the reasons you give. Actually I think YOUr confusing rounds and turns there are NO personal rounds 9for spell duration and duration yes BUT not for rounds per se, yes a spell duration starts on the turhn of the person casting BUT that is spell duration and duration NOT rounds perse).[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
immediate and Swift actions
Top