Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Immersion, Stance, and Playstyle Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mhacdebhandia" data-source="post: 2445058" data-attributes="member: 18832"><p>I'd just like to applaud the existence of any discussion which deals with the fact that roleplaying != "pretending to be someone else".</p><p></p><p>The immersive/escapist/idealised-self/persona-assumption corner of the hobby is too often viewed as the "one true way to roleplay". I've seen scores of people assert that if you're not pretending to be someone else you're not roleplaying, and it's clearly garbage.</p><p></p><p>I draw a distinction between "immersion" and "actor stance", though. I often play in actor stance - I'll change my speech patterns, put on an accent, speak in-character. I don't do this all the time, but then stance isn't about the one single way you do it. Rare is the player who spends all of his time in one stance, and the best habitual actor stance and immersive player I know will often break actor stance to explain actions rather than stand up and perform them, or even to explain his motivations - a very authorial sort of thing to do.</p><p></p><p>I would go so far as to say that I'm not convinced that immersive play is necessarily a worthy goal for many players. I'm not suggesting that it's unhealthy or lame, merely that prevailing wisdom misleads many players who would have a more rewarding experience playing in a different mode into believing that only through immersion - pretending that they are their character - can they truly roleplay.</p><p></p><p>After all, there's more than a few words' difference between "Do what you would do if you were your character" and "Do what your character would do." I think it's a difference larger than many players realise.</p><p></p><p>(Naturally, I lean towards "Do what your character would do." There's no element of self-identification or persona assumption in how I play - it's more like I'm telling the other players how this person (that I know better than anyone else at the table) would react in this situation.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mhacdebhandia, post: 2445058, member: 18832"] I'd just like to applaud the existence of any discussion which deals with the fact that roleplaying != "pretending to be someone else". The immersive/escapist/idealised-self/persona-assumption corner of the hobby is too often viewed as the "one true way to roleplay". I've seen scores of people assert that if you're not pretending to be someone else you're not roleplaying, and it's clearly garbage. I draw a distinction between "immersion" and "actor stance", though. I often play in actor stance - I'll change my speech patterns, put on an accent, speak in-character. I don't do this all the time, but then stance isn't about the one single way you do it. Rare is the player who spends all of his time in one stance, and the best habitual actor stance and immersive player I know will often break actor stance to explain actions rather than stand up and perform them, or even to explain his motivations - a very authorial sort of thing to do. I would go so far as to say that I'm not convinced that immersive play is necessarily a worthy goal for many players. I'm not suggesting that it's unhealthy or lame, merely that prevailing wisdom misleads many players who would have a more rewarding experience playing in a different mode into believing that only through immersion - pretending that they are their character - can they truly roleplay. After all, there's more than a few words' difference between "Do what you would do if you were your character" and "Do what your character would do." I think it's a difference larger than many players realise. (Naturally, I lean towards "Do what your character would do." There's no element of self-identification or persona assumption in how I play - it's more like I'm telling the other players how this person (that I know better than anyone else at the table) would react in this situation.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Immersion, Stance, and Playstyle Discussion
Top