Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 695211" data-attributes="member: 326">Re: Over the edgeHi Anabstercorian mate! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />There are a number of problems in detailing this weapon. Firstly who in their right mind would ever put the ability in a melee weapon ~ so as Gez attests its more likely to be a missile weapon.Secondly; regarding damage I think this is one of those cases where you might as well just put down that everything in the blast radius is destroyed; certainly all orbiting planets would be obliterated.As such its going to have to be a case of my best estimate rating the power at +160 pending a closer review.Two problems again; firstly the weapon would deal no damage against beings with no Con score. Secondly the effect is going to be different depending on the weapon itself if you maintain the HP damage/Con Damage switch (which I don't recommend).Quadruple strength Wounding effect is merely +8.Constitution damage +8 per hit would cost +25.If it was the Constitution damage you wanted to continue dropping (instead of hit points) then an extra +80 would give you -4/additional round.So +105 for a weapon that delivers 8 CON damage per hit with 4 CON damage each subsequent round.Looks like +20.Any others - I am enjoying this! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification