Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Immortal's Handbook continuation thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anubis" data-source="post: 743060" data-attributes="member: 2358"><p>You're not getting the point . . .</p><p></p><p>I do not advocate ANY changes to the Skill Focus feat. Not all the feats are equal, after all. Don't believe me? I have one word for you: "Endurance". That is the poster child for meaningless in this game, yet it is a feat. Indeed *I* have made it useful by making it the prerequisite for all my energy feats, but those are not core and certainly not used by everybody, unless of course you stick them in your book. The fact is, most of the feats at CR +0.2 do not equate with what they do.</p><p></p><p>Examples:</p><p></p><p>Weapon Focus gives +1 to hit with one weapon. If a character trait was simply "+1 to hit with dagger", don't even tell me that would be worth CR +0.2 when rated not as a feat. Continuing that example, +2 Strength is worth the same as a feat at CR +0.2, but yet does MUCH more than add +1 to hit with a single weapon. Let's take it a step further. In your system, the Epic Feat Great Strength gives Strength +2, which gies +1 to hit with ALL melee weapons, +1 to damage with ALL melee weapons along with bows, and increased carrying capacity. Why even take Weapon Focus if you can just keep taking Great Strength? The answer is simple . . . NOT ALL FEATS ARE EQUAL. They aren't even all worth the same as the same abilities bestowed as abilities instead of feats!</p><p></p><p>Weapon Specialization gives +2 to damage with a single weapon. Yet it gives CR +0.2 just the same as Great Strength. Great Strength would only give +1 to damage, but would give it to ALL weapons. See the tilt here?</p><p></p><p>Let's ignore the Epic Feats now for a moment.</p><p></p><p>Track. Very rarely used.</p><p></p><p>Maximize Spell. Used A LOT. Which does more? Maximize Spell of course!</p><p></p><p>How about Point Blank Shot? You get +1 to ranged attacks within 30 feet. This is worth less than Weapon Focus even!</p><p></p><p>See where I'm going with this? Many of the feats do not bestow abilities that are worth CR +0.2 in and of themselves. Hell, maybe that's your problem. Maybe you're overrating feats. After all, you have stated that all feats are worth CR +0.2, but Epic Feats are obviously much more powerful. Have you ever considered lowering feat value to CR +0.1 perhaps?</p><p></p><p>Regardless, my point is, the abilities' worths and the feat values and the skill bonus values will NEVER equate because there are too many variables!</p><p></p><p>Hell, how about this:</p><p></p><p>Compare "Alchemy +8, Appraise +8, Climb +8, Decipher Script +8, Heal +8, Innuendo +8, Read Lips +8" to "Balance +8, Concentration +8, Iaijutsu Focus +8, Jump +8, Knowledge (fusion) +8, Knowledge (ritual casting) +8, Tumble +8". It's obvious which set of bonuses is more useful. The first is, at best, worth CR +0.05, but the second is easily worth CR +0.5 due to the usefulness. The idea is to strike a balance, because the skills ARE NOT EQUAL. Factor in EVERYTHING you get with a level. These things simply are not worth that much.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, maybe you just rate feats too high. Maybe you rate feats too low. Who knows? I do know that everything has a different value, though. You gotta strike a balance.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps:</p><p></p><p>0.1 per feat</p><p>0.2 per Epic feat</p><p>0.1 per 20 skill bonuses</p><p></p><p>Think about it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is I wanna use your revised CR listings as-is without reworking everything. Or will those bonuses be for templates only? I KNOW I'm getting your book even IF I don't use this system of yours, because I DO wanna see your work on the gods. I just wanna be able to use everything, and I'm willing to help you if you're willing to listen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anubis, post: 743060, member: 2358"] You're not getting the point . . . I do not advocate ANY changes to the Skill Focus feat. Not all the feats are equal, after all. Don't believe me? I have one word for you: "Endurance". That is the poster child for meaningless in this game, yet it is a feat. Indeed *I* have made it useful by making it the prerequisite for all my energy feats, but those are not core and certainly not used by everybody, unless of course you stick them in your book. The fact is, most of the feats at CR +0.2 do not equate with what they do. Examples: Weapon Focus gives +1 to hit with one weapon. If a character trait was simply "+1 to hit with dagger", don't even tell me that would be worth CR +0.2 when rated not as a feat. Continuing that example, +2 Strength is worth the same as a feat at CR +0.2, but yet does MUCH more than add +1 to hit with a single weapon. Let's take it a step further. In your system, the Epic Feat Great Strength gives Strength +2, which gies +1 to hit with ALL melee weapons, +1 to damage with ALL melee weapons along with bows, and increased carrying capacity. Why even take Weapon Focus if you can just keep taking Great Strength? The answer is simple . . . NOT ALL FEATS ARE EQUAL. They aren't even all worth the same as the same abilities bestowed as abilities instead of feats! Weapon Specialization gives +2 to damage with a single weapon. Yet it gives CR +0.2 just the same as Great Strength. Great Strength would only give +1 to damage, but would give it to ALL weapons. See the tilt here? Let's ignore the Epic Feats now for a moment. Track. Very rarely used. Maximize Spell. Used A LOT. Which does more? Maximize Spell of course! How about Point Blank Shot? You get +1 to ranged attacks within 30 feet. This is worth less than Weapon Focus even! See where I'm going with this? Many of the feats do not bestow abilities that are worth CR +0.2 in and of themselves. Hell, maybe that's your problem. Maybe you're overrating feats. After all, you have stated that all feats are worth CR +0.2, but Epic Feats are obviously much more powerful. Have you ever considered lowering feat value to CR +0.1 perhaps? Regardless, my point is, the abilities' worths and the feat values and the skill bonus values will NEVER equate because there are too many variables! Hell, how about this: Compare "Alchemy +8, Appraise +8, Climb +8, Decipher Script +8, Heal +8, Innuendo +8, Read Lips +8" to "Balance +8, Concentration +8, Iaijutsu Focus +8, Jump +8, Knowledge (fusion) +8, Knowledge (ritual casting) +8, Tumble +8". It's obvious which set of bonuses is more useful. The first is, at best, worth CR +0.05, but the second is easily worth CR +0.5 due to the usefulness. The idea is to strike a balance, because the skills ARE NOT EQUAL. Factor in EVERYTHING you get with a level. These things simply are not worth that much. Like I said, maybe you just rate feats too high. Maybe you rate feats too low. Who knows? I do know that everything has a different value, though. You gotta strike a balance. Perhaps: 0.1 per feat 0.2 per Epic feat 0.1 per 20 skill bonuses Think about it. The problem is I wanna use your revised CR listings as-is without reworking everything. Or will those bonuses be for templates only? I KNOW I'm getting your book even IF I don't use this system of yours, because I DO wanna see your work on the gods. I just wanna be able to use everything, and I'm willing to help you if you're willing to listen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Immortal's Handbook continuation thread
Top