Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Eldorian" data-source="post: 763151" data-attributes="member: 10504">I, for one, disagree with you anubis.&nbsp; First off, i've seen nothing that is 'proof' of anything you claim.&nbsp; As for the ring of devistating critical, I'm sure the more prereqs a feat has, the more valuable it is, and that such a system will be incorperated.&nbsp; Personally I think epic and non epic feats should be on a slightly different scale.&nbsp; Perhaps a system similiar to caster level, except this will be character level, that is the level required to get the feat, and spell level, in this case how many feat prereqs it has, and these two quantities make the magic item's cost that duplicates the feat.&nbsp; As for your outragious claim that all feats shouldn't be equal and that there shouldn't be a system for putting feats into magic items, i think the facts go the other way, mate.&nbsp; One of the goals of 3e was to balance the system, because balanced systems are more fun to play.&nbsp; Anyway, its mostly pointless to argue with you.&nbsp; You'll simply claim this is a wild tangent that adresses none of the facts, and then claim that you have unrefutable proof about anything you want to prove.Eldorian Antar</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Eldorian, post: 763151, member: 10504"] I, for one, disagree with you anubis. First off, i've seen nothing that is 'proof' of anything you claim. As for the ring of devistating critical, I'm sure the more prereqs a feat has, the more valuable it is, and that such a system will be incorperated. Personally I think epic and non epic feats should be on a slightly different scale. Perhaps a system similiar to caster level, except this will be character level, that is the level required to get the feat, and spell level, in this case how many feat prereqs it has, and these two quantities make the magic item's cost that duplicates the feat. As for your outragious claim that all feats shouldn't be equal and that there shouldn't be a system for putting feats into magic items, i think the facts go the other way, mate. One of the goals of 3e was to balance the system, because balanced systems are more fun to play. Anyway, its mostly pointless to argue with you. You'll simply claim this is a wild tangent that adresses none of the facts, and then claim that you have unrefutable proof about anything you want to prove. Eldorian Antar [/QUOTE]

Verification