Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Immunities, Resistances, and High level play.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 5977746" data-attributes="member: 63508"><p>Since D&D Next is unfinished, I was pondering about how high level play might look in this new edition. Then a certain aspect of the game came to mind: immunities.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps monsters with multiple immunities could be attributed to higher level play. Lower level threats could have resistances (advantage when rolling saving throws) and flat bonuses. </p><p></p><p>An imp might be resistant to fire and poison and a grig might take half damage from weapons not made of cold iron. A pit fiend cold be immune to fire, poison, cold, and acid. A fey prince might take zero weapon damage unless the weapon it cold iron. </p><p></p><p>This would raise the importance of the damage types, school, and effects of weapons, spells, and items. Characters would seek to diversify their effects or taking specialties that bypass immunities. An experienced party might spend time seeking out various ways to get pass the immunities they now worry about. It also can work as a might balance push as characters might tie up resources to have weapons, items, and spells in the side as back up plans.</p><p></p><p>Of course it is not all good like any idea. This might encourage the return of golf bag fighters and postman wizards that carry around tons of back up weapons and scrolls. So like this while others don't. </p><p>It also can result in many no win situations. A randomly generated or quickly placed monster might be nearly impossible to kill or harm as the group lacks the appropriate tool. This might force characters to run or die/submit. Again some like it and others don't.</p><p></p><p>Then there is the all or nothing factor. Some see immunities as limiting in flavor as shut down the ability to have certain stories without having exceptions. Others say it forces the DM to pay close attention to the players' action to avoid no win situations when either the players or DMs prefer there not to be.</p><p></p><p>So what do you think? Should multiple immunities be an aspect of higher level play?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 5977746, member: 63508"] Since D&D Next is unfinished, I was pondering about how high level play might look in this new edition. Then a certain aspect of the game came to mind: immunities. Perhaps monsters with multiple immunities could be attributed to higher level play. Lower level threats could have resistances (advantage when rolling saving throws) and flat bonuses. An imp might be resistant to fire and poison and a grig might take half damage from weapons not made of cold iron. A pit fiend cold be immune to fire, poison, cold, and acid. A fey prince might take zero weapon damage unless the weapon it cold iron. This would raise the importance of the damage types, school, and effects of weapons, spells, and items. Characters would seek to diversify their effects or taking specialties that bypass immunities. An experienced party might spend time seeking out various ways to get pass the immunities they now worry about. It also can work as a might balance push as characters might tie up resources to have weapons, items, and spells in the side as back up plans. Of course it is not all good like any idea. This might encourage the return of golf bag fighters and postman wizards that carry around tons of back up weapons and scrolls. So like this while others don't. It also can result in many no win situations. A randomly generated or quickly placed monster might be nearly impossible to kill or harm as the group lacks the appropriate tool. This might force characters to run or die/submit. Again some like it and others don't. Then there is the all or nothing factor. Some see immunities as limiting in flavor as shut down the ability to have certain stories without having exceptions. Others say it forces the DM to pay close attention to the players' action to avoid no win situations when either the players or DMs prefer there not to be. So what do you think? Should multiple immunities be an aspect of higher level play? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Immunities, Resistances, and High level play.
Top