Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Walt C" data-source="post: 4101179" data-attributes="member: 46029">Thanks for the responses so far! I've appreciated them all. Keep them coming!I just wanted to take a moment to comment on a few things:First, by "standalone OGL," I do mean "using the d20 Modern SRD." At this time, I don't want to convert the Imperial Age to a new ruleset because we still have many releases on deck or forthcoming and I want everything to be compatible.Second, while I am the Line Developer, I'm not involved with layout. I can afford to spend time on developing this project without upsetting the release schedule. As Bretbo mentioned it would largely be a c&p job no matter which version we ultimately decide to use.Merova, I don't think you're being negative. "I'm not interested in either book" is just as valid an opinion as supporting one. As for your suggestions, more setting books are in the works (Burma is in layout, while Dark Continent (Africa) is being written). Some of your class suggestions are covered by Thrilling Tales classes and SRD classes and quite a few of them can be designed with just the basic classes and an appropriate occupation.As to your question regarding a release schedule, Faerie and Fisticuffs & Swordplay are due out this month and Burma is in layout. There are several other releases on the horizon, but other than Dark Continent I'm not ready to mention them yet.The Penny Dreadful is a special case. We've held off on them because the IA line casts such a wide net that we thought any adventure would only be useful to GMs running certain types of campaign. "Hell Hath No Fury" was an experiment. Based on support and feedback, we'll decide whether it's worth producing more.Walt</blockquote>

Verification