Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Implement powers from other classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 5005570" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>To address the remaining issue:</p><p></p><p>"Implement: If the class can use one or more kinds of implements, that information is noted here."</p><p>PHB page 52</p><p>Note that the default assumption is that you can't use any kind of implements.</p><p></p><p>"A warlock wielding a magic rod or wand can add its enhancement bonus to the attack rolls and the damage rolls of warlock powers, as well as warlock paragon path powers, that have the implement keyword. Without a rod or a wand, a warlock can still use these powers, but he</p><p>or she doesn’t gain the bonus provided by the magic</p><p>implement."</p><p>PHB page 131</p><p>(This is just one out of several similar passages, one for each class)</p><p>Do note that warlock implements specifically work only for</p><p>1) warlocks</p><p>2) warlock powers</p><p></p><p>And also note that the rules address the issue when you don't have the proper implement - you can still use your powers, but you don't gain anything implement-related. (See my previous post)</p><p></p><p>So a Paladin with a Warlock power is in the exact same situation as a Warlock having lost his rod or wand.</p><p></p><p>The fact the Paladin have a Holy Symbol is in no way relevant to getting any implement-related bonuses. </p><p></p><p>And you won't see it written anywhere you need this or that, because in exception based design only the exceptions are called out.</p><p></p><p>And as your implement isn't a rod or a wand your Holy Symbol can't be used to give implement-related benefits for your Warlock powers.</p><p></p><p>This however <em><strong>*IS*</strong></em> explicitly spelled out:</p><p></p><p>"In addition, you can use a rod, a wand, or a pact blade as an implement when using a warlock power or a warlock paragon path power."</p><p>PHB page 208</p><p>Note how the multiclass feat explicitly spells out that you need a warlock's implement for your warlock powers.</p><p></p><p>As mentioned upthread, there is a way to get around this: if you choose Corellon as your patron deity, you can use a Star of Corellon, which allows you to use that holy symbol for "any arcane" powers, which obviously includes Student of Caiphon.</p><p></p><p>Do note that this is supposed to have a real cost in the game: not being able to use any other holy symbol.</p><p></p><p>So the RAW is clear:</p><p></p><p>In general, the game assumes you use a second (presumably inferior) implement for your multiclass implement powers (and copes with the inconvenience of having to keep a hand free for this purpose).</p><p></p><p>Or you pick up the specialized implement for your class that can be used for the powers you've gained by multiclassing, and thus abstains from getting any other powers and properties for your holy symbol.</p><p></p><p>Feel free to houserule this, but I agree neither to any "this is how the rules can be interpreted" claims nor to the "there isn't any balance or power issue" evaluation.</p><p></p><p>WotC clearly views flexibility as a power boost in itself, and multiclassing thus carries a real cost in lowered effectiveness to compensate. This cost is not trivial, so by houseruling you need to be aware you are removing a non-trivial cost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 5005570, member: 12731"] To address the remaining issue: "Implement: If the class can use one or more kinds of implements, that information is noted here." PHB page 52 Note that the default assumption is that you can't use any kind of implements. "A warlock wielding a magic rod or wand can add its enhancement bonus to the attack rolls and the damage rolls of warlock powers, as well as warlock paragon path powers, that have the implement keyword. Without a rod or a wand, a warlock can still use these powers, but he or she doesn’t gain the bonus provided by the magic implement." PHB page 131 (This is just one out of several similar passages, one for each class) Do note that warlock implements specifically work only for 1) warlocks 2) warlock powers And also note that the rules address the issue when you don't have the proper implement - you can still use your powers, but you don't gain anything implement-related. (See my previous post) So a Paladin with a Warlock power is in the exact same situation as a Warlock having lost his rod or wand. The fact the Paladin have a Holy Symbol is in no way relevant to getting any implement-related bonuses. And you won't see it written anywhere you need this or that, because in exception based design only the exceptions are called out. And as your implement isn't a rod or a wand your Holy Symbol can't be used to give implement-related benefits for your Warlock powers. This however [I][B]*IS*[/B][/I] explicitly spelled out: "In addition, you can use a rod, a wand, or a pact blade as an implement when using a warlock power or a warlock paragon path power." PHB page 208 Note how the multiclass feat explicitly spells out that you need a warlock's implement for your warlock powers. As mentioned upthread, there is a way to get around this: if you choose Corellon as your patron deity, you can use a Star of Corellon, which allows you to use that holy symbol for "any arcane" powers, which obviously includes Student of Caiphon. Do note that this is supposed to have a real cost in the game: not being able to use any other holy symbol. So the RAW is clear: In general, the game assumes you use a second (presumably inferior) implement for your multiclass implement powers (and copes with the inconvenience of having to keep a hand free for this purpose). Or you pick up the specialized implement for your class that can be used for the powers you've gained by multiclassing, and thus abstains from getting any other powers and properties for your holy symbol. Feel free to houserule this, but I agree neither to any "this is how the rules can be interpreted" claims nor to the "there isn't any balance or power issue" evaluation. WotC clearly views flexibility as a power boost in itself, and multiclassing thus carries a real cost in lowered effectiveness to compensate. This cost is not trivial, so by houseruling you need to be aware you are removing a non-trivial cost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Implement powers from other classes
Top