Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="coyote6" data-source="post: 944878" data-attributes="member: 1225">I like most of the changes I've seen. But the ones I don't like have been excessively annoying for whatever reason; I think it's that they strike me as overreactions (e.g., the buff spell duration nerfs, Power Attack) or unneeded & seemingly arbitrary (e.g., some spell list alterations). And my cynical side expects that in 3 or 4 years, when the next revision comes out, those overchanges will be partially reversed (and my really cynical side expects that other changes will be made that will have to be partially reversed in the next revision, circa 2009; fortunately, that about exhausts my cynical side).Back! Back, cynical side! Back! PS: WotC making money is good. WotC changing the game just to make money is not good ("not good" is, of course, not necessarily the same as "evil" or "bad"). There are other ways to continue making money on a game besides creating new rulesets (just to spike sales) every few years. WotC doesn't have to give in to the Dark Side; the gaming hobby already has Games Workshop, after all. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>