Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Improved Initiative is objectively better than Danger Sense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stuntman" data-source="post: 4936641" data-attributes="member: 84817"><p>The difference between II and DS is that the person choosing II will beat the person choosing DS 55.5% of the time. DS is really close to a +3 Initiative modifier. An initiative modifer of +3 will beat DS by only 50.7% of the time.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The way I see it, Improved Initiative is probably the feat most players are familiar with. It's exactly the same as the 3E feat. Danger Sense seems like a feat you can take in addition to II. II allows you to win initiative more at the heroic tier and then if you want an even bigger boost, you have to wait until paragon teir to take DS. The exact values are close enough anyway that it doesn't make much of a difference.</p><p> </p><p>I do agree that if a player does not take II at all and then reaches paragon tier, that player may be mislead into believing that DS is better for him than II. In any case, the difference is not that great and it may even be the case that DS may be better for the player in question.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I would say that the more other bonuses you get to initiative, the more likely DS is better for you compared to II. The exact nature of the bonus would change the calculations. A strict +2 to +10 bonus to initiative will make DS a slightly better feat than II. I'm not sure about rerolls, though as I haven't made those calculations. Rerolls for rerolls will make the calculations more complex than bonuses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stuntman, post: 4936641, member: 84817"] The difference between II and DS is that the person choosing II will beat the person choosing DS 55.5% of the time. DS is really close to a +3 Initiative modifier. An initiative modifer of +3 will beat DS by only 50.7% of the time. The way I see it, Improved Initiative is probably the feat most players are familiar with. It's exactly the same as the 3E feat. Danger Sense seems like a feat you can take in addition to II. II allows you to win initiative more at the heroic tier and then if you want an even bigger boost, you have to wait until paragon teir to take DS. The exact values are close enough anyway that it doesn't make much of a difference. I do agree that if a player does not take II at all and then reaches paragon tier, that player may be mislead into believing that DS is better for him than II. In any case, the difference is not that great and it may even be the case that DS may be better for the player in question. I would say that the more other bonuses you get to initiative, the more likely DS is better for you compared to II. The exact nature of the bonus would change the calculations. A strict +2 to +10 bonus to initiative will make DS a slightly better feat than II. I'm not sure about rerolls, though as I haven't made those calculations. Rerolls for rerolls will make the calculations more complex than bonuses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Improved Initiative is objectively better than Danger Sense
Top