Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
improved invis fix.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="noretoc" data-source="post: 545017" data-attributes="member: 1276"><p>While reading the Haste poll I thought of another spell that gives me problems (BTW I have no prob with haste). I think improved invis is fine, except for one thing. A high level thief (or even low level) using it to make each attack a sneak attack.</p><p> I thought of a solution for this. If someone is fighting defensively, they can not be sneak attacked by an invisible foe if they are aware of the foes general location. In order to be aware, they must have made a listen check, or been attacked by the thief in the last two rounds. </p><p> What this does is eliminate the invisable thief from getting his SA every round, no mater what his opponent does. It still allow the thief to step back though, and come at a different angle as long as he gives his opponent a round to lose track of him, and providing he can sneak back. It also make the opponent take a -4 for all attacks, even against other opponents, so his isnt getting a round free for nothing. </p><p>opinions??</p><p>Also this does not work against a thief who is flanking him. The thief would still get his SA because of the flanking. It works only agains invisible thieves. (or thieves in melee who are howhow unable to be seen)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="noretoc, post: 545017, member: 1276"] While reading the Haste poll I thought of another spell that gives me problems (BTW I have no prob with haste). I think improved invis is fine, except for one thing. A high level thief (or even low level) using it to make each attack a sneak attack. I thought of a solution for this. If someone is fighting defensively, they can not be sneak attacked by an invisible foe if they are aware of the foes general location. In order to be aware, they must have made a listen check, or been attacked by the thief in the last two rounds. What this does is eliminate the invisable thief from getting his SA every round, no mater what his opponent does. It still allow the thief to step back though, and come at a different angle as long as he gives his opponent a round to lose track of him, and providing he can sneak back. It also make the opponent take a -4 for all attacks, even against other opponents, so his isnt getting a round free for nothing. opinions?? Also this does not work against a thief who is flanking him. The thief would still get his SA because of the flanking. It works only agains invisible thieves. (or thieves in melee who are howhow unable to be seen) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
improved invis fix.
Top