Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Improved Rapid Shot feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DrSpunj" data-source="post: 1330993" data-attributes="member: 994"><p>Maybe, but the absolute mechanics <em>are</em>! With a Full Attack Action you're getting an extra attack at your highest attack bonus with a -2 penalty to all attacks, and with IRS or by reaching the 9th monk level that penalty disappears for both. 2WF with a light offhand weapon also gives this mechanic. Anyone feel it would be overpowered to allow a feat in the 2WF chain that removes the -2 penalty at 9th level? Anyone? Have any math to back that up? I don't really know, and I'm curious. Convince me! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Now, I don't want to sidetrack this into a "is melee balanced with archery" debate, but I think some of those points have a place in this discussion. <strong>jgsugden</strong> brought up a good one with:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If doing as much damage as possible is the ultimate goal of a warrior, then the Archer has, currently, no real paths to attain that goal for the advantages he gets by being in the back row. Those advantages are significant, and I agree that he should not match the damage output (on average) of the Melee Master. As you say, <strong>Nail</strong>, the risk ratio is out of whack. But I do believe the Archer should be allowed to excel in at least <u>one</u> part of the damage equation; currently the Melee Master beats him out every time they aren't actually equal. </p><p></p><p>Both are limited by their weapon damage. For a Medium creature a 1d8 from a longbow is respectable, however with no additional feat investment the Melee Master can use his same two hands to do far more with his Greatsword at 2d6.</p><p></p><p>Both can put their Strength bonus to good effect, the Melee Master automatically, and the Archer with a composite longbow of the appropriate pull. However, in the thick of combat the Melee Master benefits twofold (both attack and damage) from any caster aiding him with Strength enhancing effects, while the Archer gains neither (increasing his Dex will improve his attack, but unless he gets a bow with a stronger pull, he's not going to be doing any extra damage with Stength enhancement magic). Strength penalties hurt the Melee Master in both attack and damage as well, but if the Archer's Strength drops below the bow's pull he suffers the same damage penalty as the Melee Master and gets to couple that with a -2 for no longer being able to effectively use his bow.</p><p></p><p>Both can increase the number of attacks they have each round. The Melee Master can choose 2WF with a similar penalty as the Archer's Rapid Shot, and with the investment of more feats can reach up to 8 attacks per round (setting aside for the moment whether it's a suboptimal or even viable fighting style, the system allows for the possibility). Only the Melee Master, however has access to feats like Cleave, and later on, Whirlwind, that give free attacks (whether Standard or Full Attack Actions) that the Archer cannot access at all. (Improved Trip seems like it should be mentioned here, but I'm not sure exactly how. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />)</p><p></p><p>When faced with DR, while both could have the appropriate weapon type in their bag 'o weapons, the Archer can only carry around so many arrows (since they break after nearly every shot), and even if the Archer has some arrows of the right material they likely don't have more than a handful in most situations. Furthermore, Archers don't have access to anything like Power Attack (barring the Peerless Archer's PrC ability) to help them overcome DR. Before 3.5 came out I was under the impression Manyshot was an attempt to mitigate some of this difficulty against DR, since multiple arrows are fired with a single attack, but that didn't pan out when I got the books and saw the feat description, so another advantage for the Melee Master. </p><p></p><p>Finally, both can increase the likelihood they're attacks will actually hit. Both have access to similar aids, be they magical weapons, the Weapon Focus feats, etc. While Archers do have a couple versions of Bracers of Archery in the DMG, and can increase their total attack bonus with Dexterity enhancing items, Melee Masters can do the same with Strength enhancing items and at the same time get the added benefit of doing extra damage. While those same Strength items would benefit an Archer, it's only after they find a bow with a stronger pull to take advantage of it. Therefore the Archer ends up spending more than twice as much (when you include the bow cost) on items as the Melee Master for the same increases to attack and damage. Still, Bracers of Archery are the one thing the Archer has that the Melee Master can't exactly match, so I guess I have to retract my statement from above: the Archer does actually have something the Melee Master doesn't/can't have, IF he has the Bracers. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>When all is said and done, I've always thought of the Archer as a marksman. Of all those things I just got done comparing, I think the Melee Master should keep his advantages with all of them...all but the last. Getting a better total attack bonus, even while doing something nifty like firing a single extra arrow (at no penalty with IRS) just seems like it fits with the Archer's schtick to me. I know most everyone else's opinions will probably be different, but unless some math head provides a solid analysis that convinces me IRS is actually unbalancing when compared to most Melee Masters, I'm probably going to keep that mental image of the marksman in my head as I try to build any Archer characters, and allow IRS as written in my own games.</p><p></p><p>Thanks.</p><p></p><p>DrSpunj</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DrSpunj, post: 1330993, member: 994"] Maybe, but the absolute mechanics [i]are[/i]! With a Full Attack Action you're getting an extra attack at your highest attack bonus with a -2 penalty to all attacks, and with IRS or by reaching the 9th monk level that penalty disappears for both. 2WF with a light offhand weapon also gives this mechanic. Anyone feel it would be overpowered to allow a feat in the 2WF chain that removes the -2 penalty at 9th level? Anyone? Have any math to back that up? I don't really know, and I'm curious. Convince me! ;) Now, I don't want to sidetrack this into a "is melee balanced with archery" debate, but I think some of those points have a place in this discussion. [b]jgsugden[/b] brought up a good one with: If doing as much damage as possible is the ultimate goal of a warrior, then the Archer has, currently, no real paths to attain that goal for the advantages he gets by being in the back row. Those advantages are significant, and I agree that he should not match the damage output (on average) of the Melee Master. As you say, [b]Nail[/b], the risk ratio is out of whack. But I do believe the Archer should be allowed to excel in at least [u]one[/u] part of the damage equation; currently the Melee Master beats him out every time they aren't actually equal. Both are limited by their weapon damage. For a Medium creature a 1d8 from a longbow is respectable, however with no additional feat investment the Melee Master can use his same two hands to do far more with his Greatsword at 2d6. Both can put their Strength bonus to good effect, the Melee Master automatically, and the Archer with a composite longbow of the appropriate pull. However, in the thick of combat the Melee Master benefits twofold (both attack and damage) from any caster aiding him with Strength enhancing effects, while the Archer gains neither (increasing his Dex will improve his attack, but unless he gets a bow with a stronger pull, he's not going to be doing any extra damage with Stength enhancement magic). Strength penalties hurt the Melee Master in both attack and damage as well, but if the Archer's Strength drops below the bow's pull he suffers the same damage penalty as the Melee Master and gets to couple that with a -2 for no longer being able to effectively use his bow. Both can increase the number of attacks they have each round. The Melee Master can choose 2WF with a similar penalty as the Archer's Rapid Shot, and with the investment of more feats can reach up to 8 attacks per round (setting aside for the moment whether it's a suboptimal or even viable fighting style, the system allows for the possibility). Only the Melee Master, however has access to feats like Cleave, and later on, Whirlwind, that give free attacks (whether Standard or Full Attack Actions) that the Archer cannot access at all. (Improved Trip seems like it should be mentioned here, but I'm not sure exactly how. :p) When faced with DR, while both could have the appropriate weapon type in their bag 'o weapons, the Archer can only carry around so many arrows (since they break after nearly every shot), and even if the Archer has some arrows of the right material they likely don't have more than a handful in most situations. Furthermore, Archers don't have access to anything like Power Attack (barring the Peerless Archer's PrC ability) to help them overcome DR. Before 3.5 came out I was under the impression Manyshot was an attempt to mitigate some of this difficulty against DR, since multiple arrows are fired with a single attack, but that didn't pan out when I got the books and saw the feat description, so another advantage for the Melee Master. Finally, both can increase the likelihood they're attacks will actually hit. Both have access to similar aids, be they magical weapons, the Weapon Focus feats, etc. While Archers do have a couple versions of Bracers of Archery in the DMG, and can increase their total attack bonus with Dexterity enhancing items, Melee Masters can do the same with Strength enhancing items and at the same time get the added benefit of doing extra damage. While those same Strength items would benefit an Archer, it's only after they find a bow with a stronger pull to take advantage of it. Therefore the Archer ends up spending more than twice as much (when you include the bow cost) on items as the Melee Master for the same increases to attack and damage. Still, Bracers of Archery are the one thing the Archer has that the Melee Master can't exactly match, so I guess I have to retract my statement from above: the Archer does actually have something the Melee Master doesn't/can't have, IF he has the Bracers. :) When all is said and done, I've always thought of the Archer as a marksman. Of all those things I just got done comparing, I think the Melee Master should keep his advantages with all of them...all but the last. Getting a better total attack bonus, even while doing something nifty like firing a single extra arrow (at no penalty with IRS) just seems like it fits with the Archer's schtick to me. I know most everyone else's opinions will probably be different, but unless some math head provides a solid analysis that convinces me IRS is actually unbalancing when compared to most Melee Masters, I'm probably going to keep that mental image of the marksman in my head as I try to build any Archer characters, and allow IRS as written in my own games. Thanks. DrSpunj [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Improved Rapid Shot feat
Top