Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DrSpunj" data-source="post: 1340672" data-attributes="member: 994">Hey, thanks for modifying the sheet that way. I thought about doing that as well, splitting the Archer column into both with and without IRS going. That's good to know.&nbsp;The other thing I thought of as I drove into work this morning is that I check for a natural 1 always failing at lower ACs, but don't bother checking for needing a natural 20 to hit the higher ACs.&nbsp;Creating a spreadsheet accounting for all these things could become a full time job! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />&nbsp;Anyone figure out how Power Critical (adds +4 to confirm a threat) would enter the calculations? Nail's provided the basic formula (sans feat) a page or two back, but how do you account for a 20% increased chance to confirm?&nbsp;Thanks.&nbsp;DrSpunj</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DrSpunj, post: 1340672, member: 994"] Hey, thanks for modifying the sheet that way. I thought about doing that as well, splitting the Archer column into both with and without IRS going. That's good to know. The other thing I thought of as I drove into work this morning is that I check for a natural 1 always failing at lower ACs, but don't bother checking for needing a natural 20 to hit the higher ACs. Creating a spreadsheet accounting for all these things could become a full time job! :p Anyone figure out how Power Critical (adds +4 to confirm a threat) would enter the calculations? Nail's provided the basic formula (sans feat) a page or two back, but how do you account for a 20% increased chance to confirm? Thanks. DrSpunj [/QUOTE]

Verification