Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caliber" data-source="post: 668022" data-attributes="member: 1310">I wouldn't really consider those must haves. Spellcasting Prodigy is probably pretty close to being a must-have, but limiting to 1st level does make it a little bit less of a &quot;duh&quot; choice. NO Rogue would go without Improved Sneak Attack. After all, that is what they focus on, Sneak Attacks.Sure Casters want more spells and better DCs, but some want to do Item Creation, Metamagic, or something else, so Spellcasting Prodigy isn't always for them. Improved Sneak Attack is always for Rogues.In a campaign I play in (although we are currently in hiatus) a Rogue took a feat very much like this (although hers was from DNW)The feat wasn't too unbalancing, but only because she was already far behind on the average party power curve. The feat went a pretty far way to bringing her closer in line with everyone else. In a standard DnD game, I would think it would be a slight bit overpoweing. YMMV.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caliber, post: 668022, member: 1310"] I wouldn't really consider those must haves. Spellcasting Prodigy is probably pretty close to being a must-have, but limiting to 1st level does make it a little bit less of a "duh" choice. NO Rogue would go without Improved Sneak Attack. After all, that is what they focus on, Sneak Attacks. Sure Casters want more spells and better DCs, but some want to do Item Creation, Metamagic, or something else, so Spellcasting Prodigy isn't always for them. Improved Sneak Attack is always for Rogues. In a campaign I play in (although we are currently in hiatus) a Rogue took a feat very much like this (although hers was from DNW) The feat wasn't too unbalancing, but only because she was already far behind on the average party power curve. The feat went a pretty far way to bringing her closer in line with everyone else. In a standard DnD game, I would think it would be a slight bit overpoweing. YMMV. [/QUOTE]

Verification