Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jaelis" data-source="post: 7613894" data-attributes="member: 60210">Here's what get's me. I agree that, with the fighting styles, the level 5-10 GWF and TWF fighters are balanced OK. But from 1-4 the TWF is considerably better, and from 11+ the GWF is better. So you could say, fix 11+ separately, and you don't care about 1-4 because it's over quickly. As for other classes: paladins, war/tempest clerics, valor bards and barbarians don't get the TWF style, which means TWF is no good at all past level 5. Rogues don't get TWF style, but want it so bad they are kind of handicapped if they don't dip into fighter for it. Monks can't really use TWF at all, which means they are handicapped if they don't use a staff or spear until their martial arts damage gets good enough. Rangers I think probably work the best, since they spend the most time in the configuration where TWF is reasonably balanced. That's why I think a more fundamental fix is better than a class-specific tweak.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jaelis, post: 7613894, member: 60210"] Here's what get's me. I agree that, with the fighting styles, the level 5-10 GWF and TWF fighters are balanced OK. But from 1-4 the TWF is considerably better, and from 11+ the GWF is better. So you could say, fix 11+ separately, and you don't care about 1-4 because it's over quickly. As for other classes: paladins, war/tempest clerics, valor bards and barbarians don't get the TWF style, which means TWF is no good at all past level 5. Rogues don't get TWF style, but want it so bad they are kind of handicapped if they don't dip into fighter for it. Monks can't really use TWF at all, which means they are handicapped if they don't use a staff or spear until their martial arts damage gets good enough. Rangers I think probably work the best, since they spend the most time in the configuration where TWF is reasonably balanced. That's why I think a more fundamental fix is better than a class-specific tweak. [/QUOTE]

Verification