Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Improvised actions in combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Erechel" data-source="post: 7396065" data-attributes="member: 6784868"><p>The way I see it, it is a big and fundamental approach to gaming. THE big turnover for me in 3.X / 4thE era was the "Hard Rules" approach to gaming: you couldn't attempt anything if you don't have a specific rule that grants you such thing. That is, if you want to throw sand in the eyes of an enemy, you need a feature that grants you such attack as an encounter power, or is nearly useless/ you just can't. It is a very video-gamey approach (no judgement involved, i LIKE videogames), in the way that you need a specific piece of code to attempt something. I'm more a "Soft Rules" player: specific powers do a thing better than average, but you can <em>still</em> do them as its most basic level, with skill checks. That is how it worked (somewhat) in AD&D, and later in the OSR movement: you can always try something, and it is up to the </p><p></p><p>5th Edition takes this approach to its heart; even the <em>stunned </em>condition is depicted as an ogre hit by what appears to be a halfling with a hammer. Most spells or special abilities grant bonuses in addition to the "average" result, take for example the Battlemaster maneuvers: they are common attacks with increased damage (superiority dice) <em>and</em> an effect, such as Frighten, knock an enemy or Disarm it. The same happens with the Open Handed monk.</p><p></p><p>There are some of these conditions with their own rules (like Disarm, in the DMG), but they are left to the DM to asign the actions and effects. The PHB advises to use skills creatively. If the game should need a rule for every minor interaction, the game will suffer of an extreme rules' bloat. That's why I, as a DM, take the approach of cost-opportunity for improvisations, applying common sense wherever it needs to have a limit. Even the game says so in the PHB. 5th Ed is a fantastic <em>system</em>, because it can resolve many things without too much effort, always following the guidelines, and not a collection of seemingly unrelated rules (a la AD&D, which was my game of preference before 5th ED, but it <em>was</em> clunky). You always have the Skill Check, Attack and Saving Throw mechanics to resolve things. Specific beats general, and it is often better than a simple skill check (EG, the Shield Master feat allows to perform a shove as a bonus action, instead of spending an attack).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Erechel, post: 7396065, member: 6784868"] The way I see it, it is a big and fundamental approach to gaming. THE big turnover for me in 3.X / 4thE era was the "Hard Rules" approach to gaming: you couldn't attempt anything if you don't have a specific rule that grants you such thing. That is, if you want to throw sand in the eyes of an enemy, you need a feature that grants you such attack as an encounter power, or is nearly useless/ you just can't. It is a very video-gamey approach (no judgement involved, i LIKE videogames), in the way that you need a specific piece of code to attempt something. I'm more a "Soft Rules" player: specific powers do a thing better than average, but you can [I]still[/I] do them as its most basic level, with skill checks. That is how it worked (somewhat) in AD&D, and later in the OSR movement: you can always try something, and it is up to the 5th Edition takes this approach to its heart; even the [I]stunned [/I]condition is depicted as an ogre hit by what appears to be a halfling with a hammer. Most spells or special abilities grant bonuses in addition to the "average" result, take for example the Battlemaster maneuvers: they are common attacks with increased damage (superiority dice) [I]and[/I] an effect, such as Frighten, knock an enemy or Disarm it. The same happens with the Open Handed monk. There are some of these conditions with their own rules (like Disarm, in the DMG), but they are left to the DM to asign the actions and effects. The PHB advises to use skills creatively. If the game should need a rule for every minor interaction, the game will suffer of an extreme rules' bloat. That's why I, as a DM, take the approach of cost-opportunity for improvisations, applying common sense wherever it needs to have a limit. Even the game says so in the PHB. 5th Ed is a fantastic [I]system[/I], because it can resolve many things without too much effort, always following the guidelines, and not a collection of seemingly unrelated rules (a la AD&D, which was my game of preference before 5th ED, but it [I]was[/I] clunky). You always have the Skill Check, Attack and Saving Throw mechanics to resolve things. Specific beats general, and it is often better than a simple skill check (EG, the Shield Master feat allows to perform a shove as a bonus action, instead of spending an attack). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Improvised actions in combat
Top