Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9734916" data-attributes="member: 6790260">All I'm saying is, I have seen--from canon WotC sources--stuff that indicates it does not have to happen that way. Couldn't care less beyond that.Also, for the record, if my bias goes in any direction with regard to tieflings vs minotaurs....it's in favor of minotaurs. I dislike the fact that people are going to hate on the latter, while I find the &quot;omg they're so COOOOOOL&quot; that tieflings get, frankly, tedious. Bael Turath made tieflings interesting; every single thing you've said about the (apparently) hard-coded 5e canon of tieflings makes them progressively more dull and one-note than the previous.As is the case with half a dozen things or more, I genuinely find the 4e lore superior. Nothing to do with the fact that it arrived in that edition--everything to do with the new lore just being a snoozefest at best and Icky Implications at worst.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9734916, member: 6790260"] All I'm saying is, I have seen--from canon WotC sources--stuff that indicates it does not have to happen that way. Couldn't care less beyond that. Also, for the record, if my bias goes in any direction with regard to tieflings vs minotaurs....it's in favor of minotaurs. I [I]dislike[/I] the fact that people are going to hate on the latter, while I find the "omg they're so COOOOOOL" that tieflings get, frankly, tedious. [I]Bael Turath[/I] made tieflings interesting; every single thing you've said about the (apparently) hard-coded 5e canon of tieflings makes them progressively more dull and one-note than the previous. As is the case with half a dozen things or more, I genuinely find the 4e lore superior. Nothing to do with the fact that it arrived in that edition--everything to do with the new lore just being a snoozefest at best and Icky Implications at worst. [/QUOTE]

Verification