Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
In Defence of D&D: The "Good Enough" System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarkChevallier" data-source="post: 5787004" data-attributes="member: 55538"><p>We can all agree that the D&D community is split at the moment. People have different opinions on many rules issues, on play style, on the place of magic in the game, on customisability, on basically everything you can mention.</p><p></p><p>But all these people were all D&D fans once; they all played the game, and presumably enjoyed playing it, even if they still disagreed with Rogues getting sneak attack on <em>every</em> flanking attack, or thought wizard spell preparation was stupid and should be a spell point system, or thought fighters should be able to do lots of amazing feats in battle.</p><p></p><p>So why did they keep playing? Why enjoy a system with flaws? I don't think most players of D&D were entirely happy with it; more-or-less everyone I know had some kind of problem with the rules, in one edition or another.</p><p></p><p>I think it's because the game was, purely and simply, good <em>enough </em>for them. It's a game that's commonly played, you can always find people to share a table with, it shares a common language and common referents, and the problems you have? They just aren't bad enough to force you out the door. It's a fun game to have fun times with friends and create a) epic stories or b) slapstick buffonery or c) gritty tales of sword and sorcery or d) all of the above and more.</p><p></p><p>D&D was never perfect, because it couldn't be perfect for everyone - everyone has a different idea for their perfect game. It had to be just <em>good enough</em> for everyone.</p><p></p><p>And what mistake did they make with D&D 4E? They tried to perfect it for a particular part of the community (including, of course, the designers themselves). They twiddled some of those dials, and it became a much better, much more enjoyable game for, let's arbitrarily say, 40% of the playerbase. For 20%, it was still "good enough". For 40%, though, it no longer was good enough. It had departed from their vision of the game, it no longer did what they wanted it to.</p><p></p><p>What lesson does this give us for 5E?</p><p></p><p>I think the most important lesson is to try and not aim for perfection; aim for "good enough", for as many people as possible, and then make it as good as you can without pushing it out of that bracket.</p><p></p><p>It also warns us not to innovate too much, in an attempt to get the game closer to your vision of perfection, because your meat is another man's poison.</p><p></p><p>I think the designers behind 5E know this; I think that's what they're trying to do. I certainly hope so. I want to see D&D become the Good Enough system again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarkChevallier, post: 5787004, member: 55538"] We can all agree that the D&D community is split at the moment. People have different opinions on many rules issues, on play style, on the place of magic in the game, on customisability, on basically everything you can mention. But all these people were all D&D fans once; they all played the game, and presumably enjoyed playing it, even if they still disagreed with Rogues getting sneak attack on [I]every[/I] flanking attack, or thought wizard spell preparation was stupid and should be a spell point system, or thought fighters should be able to do lots of amazing feats in battle. So why did they keep playing? Why enjoy a system with flaws? I don't think most players of D&D were entirely happy with it; more-or-less everyone I know had some kind of problem with the rules, in one edition or another. I think it's because the game was, purely and simply, good [I]enough [/I]for them. It's a game that's commonly played, you can always find people to share a table with, it shares a common language and common referents, and the problems you have? They just aren't bad enough to force you out the door. It's a fun game to have fun times with friends and create a) epic stories or b) slapstick buffonery or c) gritty tales of sword and sorcery or d) all of the above and more. D&D was never perfect, because it couldn't be perfect for everyone - everyone has a different idea for their perfect game. It had to be just [I]good enough[/I] for everyone. And what mistake did they make with D&D 4E? They tried to perfect it for a particular part of the community (including, of course, the designers themselves). They twiddled some of those dials, and it became a much better, much more enjoyable game for, let's arbitrarily say, 40% of the playerbase. For 20%, it was still "good enough". For 40%, though, it no longer was good enough. It had departed from their vision of the game, it no longer did what they wanted it to. What lesson does this give us for 5E? I think the most important lesson is to try and not aim for perfection; aim for "good enough", for as many people as possible, and then make it as good as you can without pushing it out of that bracket. It also warns us not to innovate too much, in an attempt to get the game closer to your vision of perfection, because your meat is another man's poison. I think the designers behind 5E know this; I think that's what they're trying to do. I certainly hope so. I want to see D&D become the Good Enough system again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
In Defence of D&D: The "Good Enough" System
Top