Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
In defence of Grognardism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rob Kuntz" data-source="post: 8398015" data-attributes="member: 7015759"><p>Logical fallacy #1: Written rules are superior to verbalization of same.</p><p></p><p>Chicken or Egg?</p><p></p><p>Upon the advent of basketball (let us assume) that a single person one day threw a ball through a hanging hoop, intentionally or otherwise. An idea occurred! That's a point! Ball through hoop =1 Point. That is a rule, of course. Now to impress those with his new discovery he immediately moved to the library to get pencil and paper to write than rule down! Actually, no. He instead gathered some of his fellow classmates and friends and informed them of his new discovery and how it worked (the RULE) and they were off and running (literally). Now as the game evolved and more rules were added it became necessary to write these down to memorize and disseminate, as this new fad was strong and in demand and was now becoming a paid endeavor even! But for the most part, people in alleyways and school yards really didn't read a book to play the game, they watched it to learn, and/or were verbally instructed by instructors no less! or by those conversant enough with the rules--who could be biased in your world, for they indeed did not carry let alone produce for such neophytes an "ABC's of Basketball" pamphlet from their person for such instruction. Along the way referees were added for those school and college matches who knew all about the rules (as memorized from books) but that they, too, did not carry upon their persons during play. Such referees bias must remain suspect according to your view, for they too are just humans lacking true balance and moral fortitude and could even be conked on the head during an errant play, thus possibly (and maybe forever!) dislocating those rules that they had so assiduously memorized!</p><p></p><p>Everyone is imperfect and/or suspect in your world of situational bias. Indeed the burden of proof to that end is upon you, not I or anyone of the millions, past present and future, like me.</p><p></p><p>I now disembark from this voyage of the absurd. <em>--finito--</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rob Kuntz, post: 8398015, member: 7015759"] Logical fallacy #1: Written rules are superior to verbalization of same. Chicken or Egg? Upon the advent of basketball (let us assume) that a single person one day threw a ball through a hanging hoop, intentionally or otherwise. An idea occurred! That's a point! Ball through hoop =1 Point. That is a rule, of course. Now to impress those with his new discovery he immediately moved to the library to get pencil and paper to write than rule down! Actually, no. He instead gathered some of his fellow classmates and friends and informed them of his new discovery and how it worked (the RULE) and they were off and running (literally). Now as the game evolved and more rules were added it became necessary to write these down to memorize and disseminate, as this new fad was strong and in demand and was now becoming a paid endeavor even! But for the most part, people in alleyways and school yards really didn't read a book to play the game, they watched it to learn, and/or were verbally instructed by instructors no less! or by those conversant enough with the rules--who could be biased in your world, for they indeed did not carry let alone produce for such neophytes an "ABC's of Basketball" pamphlet from their person for such instruction. Along the way referees were added for those school and college matches who knew all about the rules (as memorized from books) but that they, too, did not carry upon their persons during play. Such referees bias must remain suspect according to your view, for they too are just humans lacking true balance and moral fortitude and could even be conked on the head during an errant play, thus possibly (and maybe forever!) dislocating those rules that they had so assiduously memorized! Everyone is imperfect and/or suspect in your world of situational bias. Indeed the burden of proof to that end is upon you, not I or anyone of the millions, past present and future, like me. I now disembark from this voyage of the absurd. [I]--finito--[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
In defence of Grognardism
Top