Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pentius" data-source="post: 5632883" data-attributes="member: 6676736">I think it's because most discussion of 4e I've seen on this forum is reactionary(barring the 4e section, which I would say has a whole different tone from general).  In other words, it isn't that the 4e fans always want to start conversations that put mechanics first and fiction second, but when someone asks you "How do you justify this mechanic in the narrative?" that is the way the answer comes.I can't really speak as to the tone of WotC material at large.  I'll be honest, I don't read much outside the actual sourcebooks.  I don't read staff blogs, I don't read editorials in Dragon, or most of Dragon, really, unless a particular article catches my eye or I hear good things about it.  Sometimes I read a Rule of Three article, though usually that's when it's linked to me.</blockquote>