Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
In Development: Spellcaster multiclassing fix
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Purzel" data-source="post: 1100648" data-attributes="member: 11201"><p>Okay, another attempt to explain why i am working on this houserule. </p><p></p><p>I'm doing this because multiclassed spellcasters suck. They lack behind straight spellcasters way too much. Non-spellcasters on the other hand can multiclass almost freely. The figther-types gain BAB +1 each level, that's all they need. </p><p></p><p>Spellcasters loose when they multiclass. Especially casterlevel and high-level spells. My attempt on a houserule tries to make spellcaster multiclassing less bad.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First: i'm not hiding behind paladin. I'm making a houserule, that works good with the core-rules. I cannot try to make a houserule that fit any other houseruling.</p><p>And anyways, i don't think that multiclassing paladins is as common as you might think .</p><p></p><p>Second: Like i said in my first respond to your reply, a character who has a spellcaster class doesn't give it up just because he takes a different class. There are character concepts (like the MT) that WANT to synergy different kinds of magic (i.e.: arcane and divine).</p><p>I just want to make this without a prestige class (which gives a character casterlevel, but makes him loose more powerful undead turning and a better familiar). And my attempt is even more general, it works with all spellcaster-non-spellcaster combinations too.</p><p></p><p>Third: Allowing multiclassing is still a DM-decision . If he thinks, that the multiclassing of (lets says Paladin and Wizard) doesn't work, it doesn't work. </p><p>I want to build a houserule that's small and easy (maybe not very realistic, but easy to play, that's the flair of most D&D rules), i don't want to add in all kinds of exceptions, when this rule applies and when not. I don't want to tell a DM that he MUST ALLOW a paladin-wizard to gain benefits on his casterlevel.</p><p></p><p>Hope you're understanding what i want to try with the houserule. And i hope that you will tell me, how to make it better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Purzel, post: 1100648, member: 11201"] Okay, another attempt to explain why i am working on this houserule. I'm doing this because multiclassed spellcasters suck. They lack behind straight spellcasters way too much. Non-spellcasters on the other hand can multiclass almost freely. The figther-types gain BAB +1 each level, that's all they need. Spellcasters loose when they multiclass. Especially casterlevel and high-level spells. My attempt on a houserule tries to make spellcaster multiclassing less bad. First: i'm not hiding behind paladin. I'm making a houserule, that works good with the core-rules. I cannot try to make a houserule that fit any other houseruling. And anyways, i don't think that multiclassing paladins is as common as you might think . Second: Like i said in my first respond to your reply, a character who has a spellcaster class doesn't give it up just because he takes a different class. There are character concepts (like the MT) that WANT to synergy different kinds of magic (i.e.: arcane and divine). I just want to make this without a prestige class (which gives a character casterlevel, but makes him loose more powerful undead turning and a better familiar). And my attempt is even more general, it works with all spellcaster-non-spellcaster combinations too. Third: Allowing multiclassing is still a DM-decision . If he thinks, that the multiclassing of (lets says Paladin and Wizard) doesn't work, it doesn't work. I want to build a houserule that's small and easy (maybe not very realistic, but easy to play, that's the flair of most D&D rules), i don't want to add in all kinds of exceptions, when this rule applies and when not. I don't want to tell a DM that he MUST ALLOW a paladin-wizard to gain benefits on his casterlevel. Hope you're understanding what i want to try with the houserule. And i hope that you will tell me, how to make it better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
In Development: Spellcaster multiclassing fix
Top