Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Azzy" data-source="post: 6983727" data-attributes="member: 6563">One of the great things about an online community like ENWorld is that you can find others that share your views fairly easily. If you were willing, you could probably get a group together to tackle the project, and make the task much easier than doing it by yourself. This what others who's games are not 100% supported by the rules (non-standard races/classes/etc for non-FR settings, and such) have to do as well.I'm sure, but unless it's something they plan to do (which isn't likely, given the strong push-back against "magic marts" and such during the D&D Next playtest), you're up the creek if you or the community doesn't take matters into your/their own hand. And even if WotC were to do something like this, it'd be on a distant horizon.If you really want WotC to know that there are those of you that want more codified magic item pricing, the only productive recourse it to contact Mearls and Crawford on Twitter. Discussing it here with the community if fine and all, but if you actually want your voice to be heard by the D&D team, this is not the right outlet. I know some people say they don't do Twitter, but it's not like you have to pay for it or even use it for anything other than trying to contact the D&D team.</blockquote>