Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"In My General Experience Playing D&D, DMs Care More About Setting Lore Than Players Do" (a poll)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 8716155" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I don't think that that is true. I'm having a hard time thinking of an example that holds true for. I think you are trying to affirm the truth of Chekhov's Gun, using different words, but I don't even think Chekhov's Gun holds true as an absolute principle (Hemingway famously rejected it) but your restatement here of it is even less true than what Chekhov was claiming. Chekov claimed all elements of the story must be necessary to the story, but that's not the same as claiming all elements of the story must revolve around the protagonist. (And again, you are mixing up 'hero' and 'protagonist'.)</p><p></p><p>Yes, I realize we are just arguing semantics here, but semantics are important. Because when we get to this statement:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I want to agree with that idea, but how you built up to it is I think wrong and misleading. Yes, the majority of players only care about the lore setting in as much as they think that lore will inform and impact the propositions that they make in play. (I can imagine a player who has Sensation as a primary Aesthetic of play and who therefore likes being narrated to for its own sake, but I think that's rare.) On that I think we largely agree. But I don't agree that the lore of the setting must literally revolve around the protagonists in order for them to care about. If anything, good setting lore tends to make the protagonists revolve around the setting (as it were).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And see I'm with you through that, and want to agree, but then you enter into these simplified abstractions and you lose me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. </p><p></p><p>Yes, the job of the DM is to bring the setting to life, but to say that the setting is a character is to risk a great deal of information loss and create a lot of misunderstanding. There are big differences between the concepts of "setting", "NPC", and "PC". The DM has to maintain a certain degree of impartiality. In my game I have this concept of "demographics" which is one of the first things I establish for myself when planning a campaign, and it has to do with "what are average things in the setting like". It's baseline that I use to establish what anything I didn't prepare ahead of time is probably like so that when I have to improvise I have a baseline for what is fair. That's part of the setting. I'm running a Star Wars campaign right now, and so there is a ton of preexisting lore out there that by definition wasn't created to revolve around the PC's in my game. A lot of the time what I'm doing with lore is establishing to the players, "Yes, this is a Star Wars universe." I'm creating a feel to the universe that is supposedly frequently remind them of the Star Wars movies (especially the original trilogy). This has nothing to do necessarily with the PCs. It's just building a living world that draws on the players pre-existing out of game feelings.</p><p></p><p>This is not the same thing as animating an NPC or a PC. My relationship to the setting is different than my relationship to an NPC, and my ethos and relationship to an NPC when I'm a DM is different than my relationship to a PC when I'm a player. Let's just not confuse that. A "DM PC" is a problem that arises when the relationship and aesthetics of play the DM has to an NPC becomes that of a player to a PC, and it's a bad thing. The setting is literally only the time and place of a story. Sometimes people say, "The setting became almost a character in the story" when the setting is particularly richly illustrated, but that's only a metaphor. It's not a literally true claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 8716155, member: 4937"] I don't think that that is true. I'm having a hard time thinking of an example that holds true for. I think you are trying to affirm the truth of Chekhov's Gun, using different words, but I don't even think Chekhov's Gun holds true as an absolute principle (Hemingway famously rejected it) but your restatement here of it is even less true than what Chekhov was claiming. Chekov claimed all elements of the story must be necessary to the story, but that's not the same as claiming all elements of the story must revolve around the protagonist. (And again, you are mixing up 'hero' and 'protagonist'.) Yes, I realize we are just arguing semantics here, but semantics are important. Because when we get to this statement: I want to agree with that idea, but how you built up to it is I think wrong and misleading. Yes, the majority of players only care about the lore setting in as much as they think that lore will inform and impact the propositions that they make in play. (I can imagine a player who has Sensation as a primary Aesthetic of play and who therefore likes being narrated to for its own sake, but I think that's rare.) On that I think we largely agree. But I don't agree that the lore of the setting must literally revolve around the protagonists in order for them to care about. If anything, good setting lore tends to make the protagonists revolve around the setting (as it were). And see I'm with you through that, and want to agree, but then you enter into these simplified abstractions and you lose me. No. Yes, the job of the DM is to bring the setting to life, but to say that the setting is a character is to risk a great deal of information loss and create a lot of misunderstanding. There are big differences between the concepts of "setting", "NPC", and "PC". The DM has to maintain a certain degree of impartiality. In my game I have this concept of "demographics" which is one of the first things I establish for myself when planning a campaign, and it has to do with "what are average things in the setting like". It's baseline that I use to establish what anything I didn't prepare ahead of time is probably like so that when I have to improvise I have a baseline for what is fair. That's part of the setting. I'm running a Star Wars campaign right now, and so there is a ton of preexisting lore out there that by definition wasn't created to revolve around the PC's in my game. A lot of the time what I'm doing with lore is establishing to the players, "Yes, this is a Star Wars universe." I'm creating a feel to the universe that is supposedly frequently remind them of the Star Wars movies (especially the original trilogy). This has nothing to do necessarily with the PCs. It's just building a living world that draws on the players pre-existing out of game feelings. This is not the same thing as animating an NPC or a PC. My relationship to the setting is different than my relationship to an NPC, and my ethos and relationship to an NPC when I'm a DM is different than my relationship to a PC when I'm a player. Let's just not confuse that. A "DM PC" is a problem that arises when the relationship and aesthetics of play the DM has to an NPC becomes that of a player to a PC, and it's a bad thing. The setting is literally only the time and place of a story. Sometimes people say, "The setting became almost a character in the story" when the setting is particularly richly illustrated, but that's only a metaphor. It's not a literally true claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"In My General Experience Playing D&D, DMs Care More About Setting Lore Than Players Do" (a poll)
Top