Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
In Place of Chainmail?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Green Knight" data-source="post: 243577" data-attributes="member: 2723"><p>*sigh* You're missing my point entirely. But hey, if you prefer to whack away at a straw man then feel free to whack away. </p><p> </p><p>My point is this: Their is no way to accurately gauge the points value of a model. Just look at Games Workshop. They've been in the business for YEARS and they haven't come up with a way for people to make wholly new units from scratch. Such a system would be inherently unbalanced as some abilities are more powerful when used in conjunction with other abilities. That's why GW suggests that whenever creating a new unit, just work out the point value of the unit with your opponent, as the only way to determine a point value for a unit is through playtest. There is no system for determining such a thing that wouldn't end up unbalanced. </p><p> </p><p>And in the context of a D&D game, you don't NEED to know how much a unit costs pointwise, as it's not point values by which you're determining what's in your force. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>They DO know more than me. THAT'S why I'm saying what I'm saying. They THEMSELVES have said that there's no system for determining point values other than play testing, for the same reasons that I listed, above. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Didn't I address this point in a previous post? Well, let me repeat it. </p><p> </p><p>Point values are not based on Challenge Rating. They're more specific than that. For instance, the Glaiver, Human Marine and the Swiftwing Disciple in Chainmail are all first level characters. Fighter, Rogue, and Monk respectively. In D&D, they're all Challenge Rating 1 creatures. Yet in Chainmail, the Glaiver is 8 points, the Marine is 5 points, while the Swiftwing Disciple is 7 points. As you can see, point values and CR are completely unrelated. So point values on units are completely useless when it comes to figuring out experience. </p><p> </p><p>And CR is easy to figure out. Whether it's 5 on 5 or 5,000 on 5,000. There's nothing new that needs to be figured out, here. No need for "Mega-CR". Maybe some tables for simplifying the math, but nothing more than that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Green Knight, post: 243577, member: 2723"] *sigh* You're missing my point entirely. But hey, if you prefer to whack away at a straw man then feel free to whack away. My point is this: Their is no way to accurately gauge the points value of a model. Just look at Games Workshop. They've been in the business for YEARS and they haven't come up with a way for people to make wholly new units from scratch. Such a system would be inherently unbalanced as some abilities are more powerful when used in conjunction with other abilities. That's why GW suggests that whenever creating a new unit, just work out the point value of the unit with your opponent, as the only way to determine a point value for a unit is through playtest. There is no system for determining such a thing that wouldn't end up unbalanced. And in the context of a D&D game, you don't NEED to know how much a unit costs pointwise, as it's not point values by which you're determining what's in your force. They DO know more than me. THAT'S why I'm saying what I'm saying. They THEMSELVES have said that there's no system for determining point values other than play testing, for the same reasons that I listed, above. Didn't I address this point in a previous post? Well, let me repeat it. Point values are not based on Challenge Rating. They're more specific than that. For instance, the Glaiver, Human Marine and the Swiftwing Disciple in Chainmail are all first level characters. Fighter, Rogue, and Monk respectively. In D&D, they're all Challenge Rating 1 creatures. Yet in Chainmail, the Glaiver is 8 points, the Marine is 5 points, while the Swiftwing Disciple is 7 points. As you can see, point values and CR are completely unrelated. So point values on units are completely useless when it comes to figuring out experience. And CR is easy to figure out. Whether it's 5 on 5 or 5,000 on 5,000. There's nothing new that needs to be figured out, here. No need for "Mega-CR". Maybe some tables for simplifying the math, but nothing more than that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
In Place of Chainmail?
Top