Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 2859693" data-attributes="member: 29112">Um. . . what? How ambiguous is the word 'ambiguous'? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" />Speaking on my own behalf (and no-one else's), it is not that the title question is difficult to answer per se, but that it is (in my opinion) rather poorly phrased, and cannot be answered without adopting any number of varied - and possibly erroneous - assumptions regarding it (thus, it is ambiguous).Now, if other people wish to engage in doing just that, I have no problem whatsoever with them or their decision to do so. Again, speaking for me *only*, there was nothing in what I posted here that 'targeted' other posters and/or voters. It was simply me stating my opinion of the title question, and of the accompanying poll.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aus_Snow, post: 2859693, member: 29112"] Um. . . what? How ambiguous is the word 'ambiguous'? :confused: Speaking on my own behalf ([I]and no-one else's[/I]), it is not that the title question is difficult to answer [I]per se[/I], but that it is (in my opinion) rather poorly phrased, and cannot be answered without adopting any number of varied - and possibly erroneous - assumptions regarding it (thus, it is [B]ambiguous[/B]). Now, if other people wish to engage in doing just that, I have no problem whatsoever with them or their decision to do so. Again, speaking for me *only*, there was nothing in what I posted here that 'targeted' other posters and/or voters. It was simply me stating my opinion of the title question, and of the accompanying poll. [/QUOTE]

Verification