Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
In what ways would it actually be good for WotC to support 3pps: a brainstorm.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThickSkullAdv" data-source="post: 5491199" data-attributes="member: 93028"><p>Interesting question indeed. I’ll play backseat marketing guy and make some assumptions as to the “Vision Statement” WotC has for D&D as brand, and strategies to meet that vision. Grab a cold one as I wax poetic…</p><p></p><p>For sake of simplicity, let’s assume WotC has the following Vision for D&D: “<strong>Create the world’s best-known gaming brand admired for excellence in quality and value</strong>.” (Vision statements are supposed to be bold, right?) I have no idea what WotC vision/mission statement actually is, but I presume it’s something in that ballpark. Notice how that might not necessarily be the most popular game, or even limited to role-playing games.</p><p></p><p>I actually believe that WotC is indeed focused on quality (at least in their print products, which have some of the finest production in the business). And as far as value, their Core Rulebooks are comparably priced to some of their competitors. And for sake of simplicity we also have to assume their biz model includes making as much $$ as possible strategies that will support the vision to do so.</p><p></p><p>So, we now have to assume that 3pp are part of the strategy to achieve that vision. </p><p></p><p>In this instance, WotC would need to<em> control the core product very closely, but give 3pp a way to distribute product with enforced quality that helps makes the core product more valuable</em>. This would be similar to Apple’s model where they’re totally in control of iPods/IPads hardware, but create a “software app store” for 3pp which has stringent quality requirements. The benefit: WotC maintains all the core rules, but the 3PP makes the core rules more valuable by building products. The goal being: people will buy more books if there are more adventures, more campaign settings, etc., and they all work together consistently. The more core rulebooks out there, would thereby make the brand more ubiquitous helping to make it “…the worlds’ best known.” Without some sort of quality requirements, however, you might see the value diminished with glut of low-quality accessory products (think the dark days of the Atari 2600 cartridges…)</p><p></p><p>¬So, all of that said, it would be interesting to be a fly on the wall at WotC strategy meetings, for given my very limited perspective I would guess their current strategy is<em> less focused</em> on print looks something more like:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Predictable revenue stream through subscription</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Mitigate uncertainty in print market by expanding online presence</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Simplify the game</li> </ol><p></p><p>My basis for guessing this would be based on their investment in DDI (continuing to enhance, provide new content, and reconfigure to make multi-platform) as well as their re-editing content as part of Essentials. In this instance, assuming the “quality 3PP helps sell core product” holds true(core product in this case being DDI or Essentials) they’d need to be figuring out a way open up DDI with customizable content with quality controls.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, food for thought. Thanks for hanging in there through the long post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThickSkullAdv, post: 5491199, member: 93028"] Interesting question indeed. I’ll play backseat marketing guy and make some assumptions as to the “Vision Statement” WotC has for D&D as brand, and strategies to meet that vision. Grab a cold one as I wax poetic… For sake of simplicity, let’s assume WotC has the following Vision for D&D: “[B]Create the world’s best-known gaming brand admired for excellence in quality and value[/B].” (Vision statements are supposed to be bold, right?) I have no idea what WotC vision/mission statement actually is, but I presume it’s something in that ballpark. Notice how that might not necessarily be the most popular game, or even limited to role-playing games. I actually believe that WotC is indeed focused on quality (at least in their print products, which have some of the finest production in the business). And as far as value, their Core Rulebooks are comparably priced to some of their competitors. And for sake of simplicity we also have to assume their biz model includes making as much $$ as possible strategies that will support the vision to do so. So, we now have to assume that 3pp are part of the strategy to achieve that vision. In this instance, WotC would need to[I] control the core product very closely, but give 3pp a way to distribute product with enforced quality that helps makes the core product more valuable[/I]. This would be similar to Apple’s model where they’re totally in control of iPods/IPads hardware, but create a “software app store” for 3pp which has stringent quality requirements. The benefit: WotC maintains all the core rules, but the 3PP makes the core rules more valuable by building products. The goal being: people will buy more books if there are more adventures, more campaign settings, etc., and they all work together consistently. The more core rulebooks out there, would thereby make the brand more ubiquitous helping to make it “…the worlds’ best known.” Without some sort of quality requirements, however, you might see the value diminished with glut of low-quality accessory products (think the dark days of the Atari 2600 cartridges…) ¬So, all of that said, it would be interesting to be a fly on the wall at WotC strategy meetings, for given my very limited perspective I would guess their current strategy is[I] less focused[/I] on print looks something more like: [LIST=1] [*]Predictable revenue stream through subscription [*]Mitigate uncertainty in print market by expanding online presence [*]Simplify the game [/LIST] My basis for guessing this would be based on their investment in DDI (continuing to enhance, provide new content, and reconfigure to make multi-platform) as well as their re-editing content as part of Essentials. In this instance, assuming the “quality 3PP helps sell core product” holds true(core product in this case being DDI or Essentials) they’d need to be figuring out a way open up DDI with customizable content with quality controls. Anyway, food for thought. Thanks for hanging in there through the long post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
In what ways would it actually be good for WotC to support 3pps: a brainstorm.
Top