Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
In what ways would it actually be good for WotC to support 3pps: a brainstorm.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dmccoy1693" data-source="post: 5491310" data-attributes="member: 51747"><p>This is the real key figure as far as I am concerned. This would exactly be the reason why WotC should be really taking an interest in their 3PP. Regardless of where you fall in the debate, you can't argue that there was a very loud and heated debate over 4E which resulted in the success of Pathfinder. That section of the gaming community followed Paizo's lead and they therefore have a sizable leadership position. At best, this means that Wizard's Industry Leader status is threatened. At worst, they have lost control. The biggest brand recognition in the industry has not won them the day any longer just by being itself. Now wizards needs to work if they want to maintain/regain control. </p><p></p><p>To fix this image, they need allies that will work for free. That is where 3PP come in. With a little assistance, a little recognition, almost no financial cost to them, Wizards can do alot to promote their standing. DMs looking for adventures that don't suck can find them among their 3PP. Groups looking for more setting details can find them among their 3PP. Imagine how much extra exposure it would bring to a 3PP if Mearls routinely mentioned that he was reading XXX company's product this week. It would cost Wizards nothing. Nothing. But it would generate alot of good will among 3PP what work very long nights and weekends to promote their products (and Wizards' products, by extension). </p><p></p><p>One complaint I have heard from ex-4E gamers is that they missing the level of setting detail they had back in the 3E days. Now they get 1 setting book and that is it for the whole setting. Wizards could license those settings off to their 3PP just like they did with Dragonlance back in the 3E days. Wizards produces the core setting and then licenses off the rest, allowing their 3PPs to do all the work (and pay all the costs) in creating new books. Easy money.</p><p></p><p>But with the movement of 3PP from 4E to Pathfinder leaves me with a "rats fleeing a sinking ship" feeling. That always starts at the edges, but that feeling will eventually be square on them unless they do something to change the momentum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dmccoy1693, post: 5491310, member: 51747"] This is the real key figure as far as I am concerned. This would exactly be the reason why WotC should be really taking an interest in their 3PP. Regardless of where you fall in the debate, you can't argue that there was a very loud and heated debate over 4E which resulted in the success of Pathfinder. That section of the gaming community followed Paizo's lead and they therefore have a sizable leadership position. At best, this means that Wizard's Industry Leader status is threatened. At worst, they have lost control. The biggest brand recognition in the industry has not won them the day any longer just by being itself. Now wizards needs to work if they want to maintain/regain control. To fix this image, they need allies that will work for free. That is where 3PP come in. With a little assistance, a little recognition, almost no financial cost to them, Wizards can do alot to promote their standing. DMs looking for adventures that don't suck can find them among their 3PP. Groups looking for more setting details can find them among their 3PP. Imagine how much extra exposure it would bring to a 3PP if Mearls routinely mentioned that he was reading XXX company's product this week. It would cost Wizards nothing. Nothing. But it would generate alot of good will among 3PP what work very long nights and weekends to promote their products (and Wizards' products, by extension). One complaint I have heard from ex-4E gamers is that they missing the level of setting detail they had back in the 3E days. Now they get 1 setting book and that is it for the whole setting. Wizards could license those settings off to their 3PP just like they did with Dragonlance back in the 3E days. Wizards produces the core setting and then licenses off the rest, allowing their 3PPs to do all the work (and pay all the costs) in creating new books. Easy money. But with the movement of 3PP from 4E to Pathfinder leaves me with a "rats fleeing a sinking ship" feeling. That always starts at the edges, but that feeling will eventually be square on them unless they do something to change the momentum. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
In what ways would it actually be good for WotC to support 3pps: a brainstorm.
Top