Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Doug McCrae" data-source="post: 5312285" data-attributes="member: 21169">I think most of my GMs have been good, with several greats. Most respondents to the poll will, I think, have similar views because people tend to only game with those they consider to be good, and to leave games where the other participants are perceived to be bad.That raises another question - how high are one's standards? One man's good might be another man's mediocre. One could argue that, by definition, I should regard roughly 50% of the GMs I've had as bad, and 50% good, that's what good and bad mean!Over the last 15 years I've had quite a few GMs, if you count conventions and other oneoffs. It would only be about ten if you don't. The convention GMs tended to be worse than my regulars, that could well be due to different tastes. I've probably ended up, unconsciously, doing my regular gaming with those who have similar styles and tastes to my own.</blockquote>