Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 7995834" data-attributes="member: 5142">Your behavior in this thread has been anything but cool.I mention the gnomes, because it was something that WotC discovered when people were upset about the lack of gnomes in the 4E PHB1. Of course, those people only had to wait just a year to get gnomes in PHB2. I did not say that Dark Sun is in this territory. This is either your inability to read what I wrote or your desire to shove false arguments in my mouth. I only said that psionics is similar to gnomes in that tables who did like them are effected. But we could also make a comparison to Artificers as well. Artificers are niche too. Artificers were regarded as nigh necessary for running Eberron since they are an integral part of the setting. WotC published an Artificer which is in a similar territory as psionics. Should WotC not have made the Artificer? How many people will use the Artificer compared to psionics? Or is your dislike of psionics flavoring your sense of perspective here? Given how you behaved yourself in this thread and other threads regarding psionics, I doubt your earnest desire to discuss psionics in good faith. Maybe this is the lesson that you truly learned from the anti-warlord crowd about how to argue against a class: don't argue against it in good faith.Give the alternative is a lack of reasons, I'm at least glad that you agree that the pro-psionics side has reasons.In regards to psionics, sorry, but yeah. You kinda have a repetitive habit of being unreasonable. You're an otherwise fairly cool person in other topics, but not when it comes to psionics territory.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 7995834, member: 5142"] Your behavior in this thread has been anything but cool. I mention the gnomes, because it was something that WotC discovered when people were upset about the lack of gnomes in the 4E PHB1. Of course, those people only had to wait just a year to get gnomes in PHB2. I did not say that Dark Sun is in this territory. This is either your inability to read what I wrote or your desire to shove false arguments in my mouth. I only said that psionics is similar to gnomes in that tables who did like them are effected. But we could also make a comparison to Artificers as well. Artificers are niche too. Artificers were regarded as nigh necessary for running Eberron since they are an integral part of the setting. WotC published an Artificer which is in a similar territory as psionics. Should WotC not have made the Artificer? How many people will use the Artificer compared to psionics? Or is your dislike of psionics flavoring your sense of perspective here? Given how you behaved yourself in this thread and other threads regarding psionics, I doubt your earnest desire to discuss psionics in good faith. Maybe this is the lesson that you truly learned from the anti-warlord crowd about how to argue against a class: don't argue against it in good faith. Give the alternative is a lack of reasons, I'm at least glad that you agree that the pro-psionics side has reasons. In regards to psionics, sorry, but yeah. You kinda have a repetitive habit of being unreasonable. You're an otherwise fairly cool person in other topics, but not when it comes to psionics territory. [/QUOTE]

Verification