Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="xigbar" data-source="post: 5534488" data-attributes="member: 6673175"><p>I'm designing a campaign with a slight predicament. One of the players is playing an Incarnate, Lawful Neutral. The first thing is that I will only be DMing for 5 of the dungeons, my friend is doing the other 15. I am doing the first one, because both of the two characters I'm interested in playing have a +1 level adjustment. For the purpose of roleplaying, the Incarnate doesn't get along with who don't share their world view, but just how far does that go. The first character I'd like to play is a tiefling wizard, neutral good, which we've decided shouldn't have much trouble interacting with the Incarnate, because she's too bookish and timid to break the law in most cases anyway. However, I do fancy the idea of SOME internal conflict to add to the story and such, and also consider playing a Goliath Barbarian, Chaotic Good. This would satisfy my desire to have some mild feuds between characters here and there, but how far does this carry in terms of the Incarnates roleplaying? Is he obligated to assault someone who is so strongly opposed to their own moral standing, distracting from the actual game play? I want your thoughts, as both a player and a dm.</p></blockquote><p></p>