Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Incorporating the Gestalt Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Viktyr Gehrig" data-source="post: 1659701" data-attributes="member: 9249"><p>My concern isn't so much the raw number of feats, as it is the overlapping feat lists-- allowing Ftr/PsW would allow them to take almost the entire Fighter bonus feat list. While Gestalt characters are overall more powerful than standard characters, this combination, I feel, would be unbalancing, as several of those feats can be used in conjunction.</p><p></p><p> By comparison, a Sor/Wiz, while being able to cast spells all day, is still limited by their inability to cast more than one or two spells in a single round.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> It is. And, I have considered allowing it, but in the context of my current campaign (which involves two concurrent games, one of which uses d20 Modern rules), it'd allow the Ftr/PsW to have more feats than any possible d20 Modern character-- and their current slight edge in feats is one of the few advantages that the Modern characters have.</p><p></p><p> In a standalone D&D campaign, I would be more inclined to allow the combination, especially given that the Ftr/PsW gives up several benefits of the Gestalt system since most of their other abilities overlap.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> Well, if you're doing away with Favored Classes, it would likewise make sense to not use my Favored Gestalt rules. Like Favored Class, they're designed mainly to help reinforce racial stereotypes, while allowing characters to step outside of them if they so prefer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Viktyr Gehrig, post: 1659701, member: 9249"] My concern isn't so much the raw number of feats, as it is the overlapping feat lists-- allowing Ftr/PsW would allow them to take almost the entire Fighter bonus feat list. While Gestalt characters are overall more powerful than standard characters, this combination, I feel, would be unbalancing, as several of those feats can be used in conjunction. By comparison, a Sor/Wiz, while being able to cast spells all day, is still limited by their inability to cast more than one or two spells in a single round. It is. And, I have considered allowing it, but in the context of my current campaign (which involves two concurrent games, one of which uses d20 Modern rules), it'd allow the Ftr/PsW to have more feats than any possible d20 Modern character-- and their current slight edge in feats is one of the few advantages that the Modern characters have. In a standalone D&D campaign, I would be more inclined to allow the combination, especially given that the Ftr/PsW gives up several benefits of the Gestalt system since most of their other abilities overlap. Well, if you're doing away with Favored Classes, it would likewise make sense to not use my Favored Gestalt rules. Like Favored Class, they're designed mainly to help reinforce racial stereotypes, while allowing characters to step outside of them if they so prefer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Incorporating the Gestalt Rules
Top