Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Incorporeal Vs. Bracers of Armor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 413244" data-attributes="member: 284"><p>They are specific varieties of touch attacks. </p><p></p><p>An incorporeal touch attack is identical to a normal touch attack, with the exception that it can't ignore force based armor. Otherwise it would just be a touch attack. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And incorporeal attacks have specific, spelled out rules as well. </p><p></p><p>Thus an incorporeal touch attack has the strengths and limitations of both a touch attacks and incorporeal attacks. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's a touch attack because it's incorporeal, and thus ignores all normal armor. However, incorporeal attacks by definition do not ignore force based armor. Pretty simple.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As a physical incorporeal attack, not as a spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is a "real" touch attack that happens to be stopped by force armor, because it has "incorporeal" attributes. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Show me a creature that has an incorporeal attack that is not an incorporeal touch attack. </p><p></p><p>By your reasoning, there is no incorporeal attack in the core rules that can be stopped by force based armor, and the text in the DMG is completely pointless. </p><p></p><p>Incorporeal touch attacks are simply a special subset of touch attacks that can't ignore force based armor, but ignore all other types of armor bonuses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 413244, member: 284"] They are specific varieties of touch attacks. An incorporeal touch attack is identical to a normal touch attack, with the exception that it can't ignore force based armor. Otherwise it would just be a touch attack. [b][/b] And incorporeal attacks have specific, spelled out rules as well. Thus an incorporeal touch attack has the strengths and limitations of both a touch attacks and incorporeal attacks. [b][/b] It's a touch attack because it's incorporeal, and thus ignores all normal armor. However, incorporeal attacks by definition do not ignore force based armor. Pretty simple. [b][/b] As a physical incorporeal attack, not as a spell. [b][/b] It is a "real" touch attack that happens to be stopped by force armor, because it has "incorporeal" attributes. [b][/B] Show me a creature that has an incorporeal attack that is not an incorporeal touch attack. By your reasoning, there is no incorporeal attack in the core rules that can be stopped by force based armor, and the text in the DMG is completely pointless. Incorporeal touch attacks are simply a special subset of touch attacks that can't ignore force based armor, but ignore all other types of armor bonuses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Incorporeal Vs. Bracers of Armor
Top