Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Increasing combat mobility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thondor" data-source="post: 3561583" data-attributes="member: 31955"><p>OK now I'm getting it. I did have it originally, lost it somewhere along the way. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really, wouldn't the archer be suffering the same restrictions as the meleeer (swordsman)? Assuming the ranged weapons person must shoot at the end of their move, or at the begining . . .</p><p>(Do I really want to be defending your system? ah well here goes)</p><p>Taking a level 6 archer and Level 6 swordsman (fFull BAB characters, ie both have 2 attacks) both Human in Light armor.</p><p><strong>Use it you lose it system</strong></p><p>1)Opponents start 30 ft away,</p><p> a) Swordsman wins initiative, takes full move, gets one Attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p> b) Archer wins initiative, moves back 15ft makes 2 attacks. Swordsman charges 45st, gets one attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p> c) Archer wins initiative, moves back 30ft makes 1 attacks. Swordsman charges 45ft, gets one attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p></p><p>Given situation 1) under my system, differences are as follows</p><p> a) Swordsman Gets full attack</p><p> b) and c) the archer gets 2 attacks regarless of wether he moves 5 or 30ft. </p><p></p><p>Situation 2) combatants start 45st away</p><p>Use-it -lose it system</p><p> a) swordsmen wins initiative and charges gets one Attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p> B) Archwer wins initiative moves 15ft and makes 2 attacks. Swordsman charges 60ft and makes one attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p> c) Archer wins initiative, moves back 30ft makes 1 attacks. Swordsman runs 75 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p></p><p>Given situation 2 under my system,</p><p> A) no change</p><p> B) smart archer will move more then 15ft (see c) in order to make charge impossible.</p><p> C) Archer makes 2 attacks.</p><p></p><p>Situation 3) start 50ft apart, under use you lose</p><p> A) same as 2 a)</p><p> B) Archer Movevs 15ft gets 2 attacks. Swordsman runs 65 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p> C) smart archer has no reason to move 30ft</p><p></p><p>Given situation 3) under my system</p><p> nothing changes</p><p></p><p>Situation 4) start 65 ft apart.Under Use-or_you-lose</p><p> A) Swordsman wins initiative runs 65 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p> B) Archer wins initiative. Has no real incentive to move. makes 2 attacks. Swordsmen runs 65 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game.</p><p></p><p>Given Situtation 4) under my system</p><p> nothing changes</p><p></p><p>The situations don't become that different unless there is large distance in the begining and/or large discrepancies in movement. IE. Archer has 40ft speed, swordsman has 20ft or 15ft.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thondor, post: 3561583, member: 31955"] OK now I'm getting it. I did have it originally, lost it somewhere along the way. Not really, wouldn't the archer be suffering the same restrictions as the meleeer (swordsman)? Assuming the ranged weapons person must shoot at the end of their move, or at the begining . . . (Do I really want to be defending your system? ah well here goes) Taking a level 6 archer and Level 6 swordsman (fFull BAB characters, ie both have 2 attacks) both Human in Light armor. [B]Use it you lose it system[/B] 1)Opponents start 30 ft away, a) Swordsman wins initiative, takes full move, gets one Attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. b) Archer wins initiative, moves back 15ft makes 2 attacks. Swordsman charges 45st, gets one attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. c) Archer wins initiative, moves back 30ft makes 1 attacks. Swordsman charges 45ft, gets one attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. Given situation 1) under my system, differences are as follows a) Swordsman Gets full attack b) and c) the archer gets 2 attacks regarless of wether he moves 5 or 30ft. Situation 2) combatants start 45st away Use-it -lose it system a) swordsmen wins initiative and charges gets one Attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. B) Archwer wins initiative moves 15ft and makes 2 attacks. Swordsman charges 60ft and makes one attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. c) Archer wins initiative, moves back 30ft makes 1 attacks. Swordsman runs 75 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. Given situation 2 under my system, A) no change B) smart archer will move more then 15ft (see c) in order to make charge impossible. C) Archer makes 2 attacks. Situation 3) start 50ft apart, under use you lose A) same as 2 a) B) Archer Movevs 15ft gets 2 attacks. Swordsman runs 65 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. C) smart archer has no reason to move 30ft Given situation 3) under my system nothing changes Situation 4) start 65 ft apart.Under Use-or_you-lose A) Swordsman wins initiative runs 65 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. B) Archer wins initiative. Has no real incentive to move. makes 2 attacks. Swordsmen runs 65 feet, cannot make attack. If archer moves away provoques attack of oppurtunity, Archer either drops bow and starts melee or plays the stupid 5ft game. Given Situtation 4) under my system nothing changes The situations don't become that different unless there is large distance in the begining and/or large discrepancies in movement. IE. Archer has 40ft speed, swordsman has 20ft or 15ft. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Increasing combat mobility
Top