Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Indie game designers unite to buy D&D!?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stasis_Delirium" data-source="post: 5986993" data-attributes="member: 6697114"><p>I personally believe it would only serve to decimate forward initiative in game design not only for D&D as a brand, but ALL of those designer's new works.</p><p></p><p>Going to a business model that only supports old things could mean D&D stagnates at a point. Every single one of those designers at each of those companies suddenly have to learn the intricacies of every other old edition of D&D just to be able to deal with the numerical tweaks needed to cross-convert things to the various editions. Massive amounts of effort is put into number tweaks, not innovation.</p><p></p><p>Personal projects of Indie game developers all die. The business of running a core D&D brand takes up all of their time and effort (Since business managers all have to get together to hash out an actual plan as a whole). Designers suddenly stop work on really intriguing non-D&D efforts. Numenera dies, Diaspora dies, All these lines that support different thinking and creativity and artistic design all wither.</p><p></p><p>Art directors are handed the absolute and solvent nightmare of having to figure out what art direction works for what edition. Many artists of older editions don't WANT to return to do work (DAT, for example). The nightmare only continues when fans start complaining that they don't want to see WAR's work in the 1e/2e conversion/design materials, or Erol Otus working on anything 4e.</p><p></p><p>And worse yet. Competition dies.</p><p></p><p>This is, of course, personal opinion. I don't actually have knowledge of inner workings for game companies, but honestly I would see this as an effort in trying to harness chaos itself. </p><p></p><p>Lastly, those people who are looking forward to 5e because they actually LIKE what they see are ignored. I cannot understand why the voice of a fan of older editions is any more important than those who are looking forward to what 5e could offer. I have yet to have someone give me a concrete reason for this outside of personal preference.</p><p></p><p>Just my toss of the copper anyway.</p><p></p><p>-T.J.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stasis_Delirium, post: 5986993, member: 6697114"] I personally believe it would only serve to decimate forward initiative in game design not only for D&D as a brand, but ALL of those designer's new works. Going to a business model that only supports old things could mean D&D stagnates at a point. Every single one of those designers at each of those companies suddenly have to learn the intricacies of every other old edition of D&D just to be able to deal with the numerical tweaks needed to cross-convert things to the various editions. Massive amounts of effort is put into number tweaks, not innovation. Personal projects of Indie game developers all die. The business of running a core D&D brand takes up all of their time and effort (Since business managers all have to get together to hash out an actual plan as a whole). Designers suddenly stop work on really intriguing non-D&D efforts. Numenera dies, Diaspora dies, All these lines that support different thinking and creativity and artistic design all wither. Art directors are handed the absolute and solvent nightmare of having to figure out what art direction works for what edition. Many artists of older editions don't WANT to return to do work (DAT, for example). The nightmare only continues when fans start complaining that they don't want to see WAR's work in the 1e/2e conversion/design materials, or Erol Otus working on anything 4e. And worse yet. Competition dies. This is, of course, personal opinion. I don't actually have knowledge of inner workings for game companies, but honestly I would see this as an effort in trying to harness chaos itself. Lastly, those people who are looking forward to 5e because they actually LIKE what they see are ignored. I cannot understand why the voice of a fan of older editions is any more important than those who are looking forward to what 5e could offer. I have yet to have someone give me a concrete reason for this outside of personal preference. Just my toss of the copper anyway. -T.J. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Indie game designers unite to buy D&D!?
Top